Interesting Article from a Conservative Apostolic - Page 40

Sister Alvear · #**391** 07-19-2008, 03:12 PM

I do not even know the Mangums...so my response is not to take up for some friend or supporter in fact most circles I fellowship are independent are far more con...however why would we want to bash people especially on a public form?

rgcraig · #**392** 07-19-2008, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Daniel and PP owe me an apology! I'm waiting!!

Before you start demanding apologies I think I remember reading yesterday you tagged Daniel as the author of that plea to change UPC.

What's the difference?

rgcraig · #**393** 07-19-2008, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaxfam6

must have been back years ago when MM decided to stop spending HOURS on her hair and started being more down to earth with it so that she could spend the time saved in prayer and the work of the kingdom rather than have the perfect pentecostal poof.

MM has NEVER spent hours on her hair - - she's worn that same knot for 30 years!

Ron · #**394** 07-19-2008, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Before you start demanding apologies I think I remember reading yesterday you tagged Daniel as the author of that plea to change UPC.

What's the difference?

If one does something worthy of an apology being given it makes no difference what the other does in my opinion.

One doesn't negate the other.

I am sorry if you take this the wrong way.

rgcraig · #**395** 07-19-2008, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

If one does something worthy of an apology being given it makes no difference what the other does in my opinion.

One doesn't negate the other.

I am sorry if you take this the wrong way.

Ron, dear - you need to lighten up a little bit.

I was just messing with PO.

However, don't you think it's a little funny that she wants an apology for what she did herself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Ummmm....

Author: Daniel

The originator of this petition hopes to reach 1,000 signatures. As of now, 3:40 PM Eastern Time, five people have signed the petition, with one signing anonymously.

Ron · #**396** 07-19-2008, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Ron, dear - you need to lighten up a little bit.

I was just messing with PO.

However, don't you think it's a little funny that she wants an apology for what she did herself.

I do have a tight back.

Personally, I think it is funny that while I have seen many on here apologize, I have seen others never, why is that?

If someone said that I offended them and they are asking for an apology, I would give it, in a heart beat, regardless of what I felt for or against what was done.

JMO

Ron · #**397** 07-19-2008, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Ron, dear - you need to lighten up a little bit.

I was just messing with PO.

However, don't you think it's a little funny that she wants an apology for what she did herself.

Did she make a direct accusation that he was the one?
Could she not have been messing?

That & I think Dan pressed the point with her to the point she had to vigorously deny it.

Pressing-On · #**398** 07-19-2008, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Did she make a direct accusation that he was the one?
Could she not have been messing?

That & I think Dan pressed the point with her to the point she had to vigorously deny it.

Thanks, Ron!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

LOL! Daniel! Go look at the link again. It says: Author: Daniel!!

Pressing-On · #**399** 07-19-2008, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Before you start demanding apologies I think I remember reading yesterday you tagged Daniel as the author of that plea to change UPC.

What's the difference?

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Ron, dear - you need to lighten up a little bit.

I was just messing with PO.

However, don't you think it's a little funny that she wants an apology for what she did herself.

Really? A little different response on the Board than the one I got in PM, Renda. Hmmmm...

Steve Epley · #**400** 07-19-2008, 04:53 PM

I think I made one harmless post on the thread I do not know Elder Graham nor have I had the privilege of hearing him preach. The person who posted this was wrong they violated a closed forum rule. However it seems it did some good SG's relatives came out of the corner swinging defending him.

So all is not lost.

The problem I see with forum land period is when persons are being discussed there is always a opportunity for only excerpts to be quoted.
Rford was painted as a UPC apologist and the majority of those men are not UPC.
So the way I see it very few if any had anything about this correct.