One People, One Gospel, One Plan

[CalledOut238]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Please understand that my post was not an attempt to pin you with the label of antinomianism, or to claim that you were an antinomian. I have not labelled you anything, nor your ideas as anything. Re-read my statements carefully and you should see that I was not saying you are an antinomian.

Your ad hominem disputations of my post were not about me rather the content of the teaching for argumentum ad populum. This deductive argument technique is nothing more than an informal fallacy. Let just agree that we believe all scriptures are relevant since our perspectives and reasoning differ. I believe my understanding is the logical interpretation and you see your logic in the same light. But I still contend there is One People, One Gospel, One Plan.

Selah

[Amanah]

Originally Posted by CalledOut238

Your ad hominem disputations of my post were not about me rather the content of the teaching for argumentum ad populum. This deductive argument technique is nothing more than an informal fallacy. Let just agree that we believe all scriptures are relevant since our perspectives and reasoning differ. I believe my understanding is the logical interpretation and you see your logic in the same light. But I still contend there is One People, One Gospel, One Plan.

Selah

Is this the same as saying "let's just agree to disagree?"

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by CalledOut238

Your ad hominem disputations of my post were not about me rather the content of the teaching for argumentum ad populum. This deductive argument technique is nothing more than an informal fallacy. Let just agree that we believe all scriptures are relevant since our perspectives and reasoning differ. I believe my understanding is the logical interpretation and you see your logic in the same light. But I still contend there is One People, One Gospel, One Plan.

Selah

I did not and do not claim there is NOT one People, one gospel, one Plan. I agree with that entirely.

I did not make an ad hominem argument, because I did not accuse you of any perfidy and then reason "because CalledOut is a bad person, therefore his argument is refuted." Nor did I argue from ad populum, because I did not argue "everybody agrees such and such is true, therefore such and such is in fact true".

[CalledOut238]

Originally Posted by Esaias

I did not and do not claim there is NOT one People, one gospel, one Plan. I agree with that entirely.

I did not make an ad hominem argument, because I did not accuse you of any perfidy and then reason "because CalledOut is a bad person, therefore his argument is refuted." Nor did I argue from ad populum, because I did not argue "everybody agrees such and such is true, therefore such and such is in fact true".

Your voice is recognized on this board as true the majority of the time. And many will hold your frame of reference in high esteem. Which is quality to be admired and I am sure had to be earned. I seems we are both contending for the same truth but from different perspectives. My passion for perfection is a double edge sword when defending a position. I do respect your insight for you are a true Urbanus et instructus.

Proverbs 27:17 (KJV) Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.

Selah

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by CalledOut238

Your voice is recognized on this board as true the majority of the time. And many will hold your frame of reference in high esteem. Which is quality to be admired and I am sure had to be earned. I seems we are both contending for the same truth but from different perspectives. My passion for perfection is a double edge sword when defending a position. I do respect your insight for you are a true Urbanus et instructus.

Proverbs 27:17 (KJV) Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.

Selah

I don't know Italian so have no idea what you called me but I trust it's something good.

[berkeley]

Don't let this distract you from the the fact that in 1966, Al Bundy scored four touchdowns in a single game while playing for the Polk High School Panthers in the 1966 city championship game versus Andrew Johnson High School, including the game-winning touchdown in the final seconds against his old nemesis, Bubba "Spare Tire" Dixon.

[Apostolic1ness]

Originally Posted by berkeley

Don't let this distract you from the the fact that in 1966, Al Bundy scored four touchdowns in a single game while playing for the Polk High School Panthers in the 1966 city championship game versus Andrew Johnson High School, including the game-winning touchdown in the final seconds against his old nemesis, Bubba "Spare Tire" Dixon.

Didn't Al Bundy grow up to become a women's shoe salesman and marry a woman named Peg and have two kids a boy and a girl? If I recall Peg was not that good of a cook.

[CalledOut238]

Originally Posted by Esaias

I don't know Italian so have no idea what you called me but I trust it's something good.

It's Latin for a gentleman and a scholar. When one had twin daughters; who took multiple classes in Latin, one may have to look up what they just said.

Selah

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by CalledOut238

It's Latin for a gentleman and a scholar. When one had twin daughters; who took multiple classes in Latin, one may have to look up what they just said.

Selah

ROFL! That's funny.