Bundy Ranch, BLM, Harry Reid and the Chinese

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by n david

And that is exactly what Bundy is arguing... that when NV became a state, the feds ceased to control the public lands.

Sounds like Bundy is smarter than most think.

There truly needs to be a state revolt and re-taking of states rights. The gov has grown out of control. BLM, Interior, and especially the EPA all need to be reigned in and better controlled.

This whole thing is totally awesome. I remember when some of my dad's horses got out, the "new" neighbor said he'd have to pay to get them back. He drove to the neighbor's house, gun in hand, and got his horses back.

If that was Texas and my father was alive, he would be on his horse with the Bundy's and I would be on mine with him.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The Bundy Ranch Video Facebook Won’t Let You See?

Posted yesterday, the video already has 105k hits. For all intents and purposes, the video has gone viral. However, some are saying that Facebook is doing its best to stand in the way of people seeing it. Reports started flooding the internet claiming that Facebook was blocking the video from being posted directly to their walls.

http://benswann.com/the-bundy-ranch-...t-let-you-see/

Did you see all the guns on the protestors? The snipers up on the ridge pointing guns at the BLM? /sarcasm

I did see maybe two revolvers in a gun belt. The thugs in the military unis had auto assault rifles and riot shields.

Who posed more of a threat , JD? The mostly unarmed protestors or the BLM thugs working for Hypocrite Harry Reid?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

This whole thing is totally awesome. I remember when some of my dad's horses got out, the "new" neighbor said he'd have to pay to get them back. He drove to the neighbor's house, gun in hand, and got his horses back.

If that was Texas and my father was alive, he would be on his horse with the Bundy's and I would be on mine with him.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Bill O'Reilly and his panel all agreed on calling the Bundy situation a hot bed for "right-wing extremists".

The panel and the video shown on his show last night showed the extremists with their weapons.

One of his panel guests said this was Ruby Ridge all over again.

O'Reilly said he didn't think that Bundy was going to back down, implying that when this does end it won't be pretty.


It should go without saying, but just about every one is able to see clearly that this bozo is greedy and wrong.

[Jermyn Davidson]

“We were actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front,” Mack said in a Fox News clip pulled by The Blaze. Mack is a former Sheriff for one of Arizona's rural counties, a Tea Party supporter, militia member and white suppremacist literary collaborator.

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/04/cl...nned-use-women

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...usaolp00000592


Yeah, these are the type of people defending Cliven Bundy-- men that want to put the women purposely and directly in the line of fire, to gain sympathy and support for their cause!

If they had a just cause, they wouldn't have to do this!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

“We were actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front,” Mack said in a Fox News clip pulled by The Blaze. Mack is a former Sheriff for one of Arizona's rural counties, a Tea Party supporter, militia member and white suppremacist literary collaborator.

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/04/cl...nned-use-women

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...usaolp00000592


Yeah, these are the type of people defending Cliven Bundy-- men that want to put the women purposely and directly in the line of fire, to gain sympathy and support for their cause!

If they had a just cause, they wouldn't have to do this!

Ummm, Jermyn, It was a tactical ploy that the women agreed to. So, we had both brave men AND women involved.

Sheriff Richard Mack:

“It was a tactical ploy that I was trying to get them to use.” says Mack. Mack goes on to clarify that the ploy was not adopted and that he was not on the scene during the standoff. He continued by saying that he would risk his own life as well in taking a stand.

“I would have been next. I would have been the next one to be killed. I’m not afraid to die here, I’m willing to die here. But the best ploy would have been to have had women in front because one, I don’t think they would have shot them. Two, if they had it would have been the best thing to show the rest of the world that these ruthless cowards will do anything they are told. If they are told to shoot they will shoot. Just like when they shot Vicki Weaver when they blew her head off in front of her little girl while she was holding a baby.” says Mack.

http://benswann.com/truth-did-bundy-...ederal-agents/

I asked you once and you never answered, because I am sure it made you angry, but would you fire on American citizens being part of the military? You seem like you are all gung-ho for it.

The issue is that the Feds took a wrong-headed and strong armed stance, when all they had to do was calculate the amount of money Bundy owed, docket it and then place a lien on the property.

But, no, they wanted to act like Nazi Germany. The American people are not going to stand for it.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Ummm, Jermyn, It was a tactical ploy that the women agreed to. So, we had both brave men AND women involved.

Ummm, Pressing-On, There isn't anything tactically efficient about putting women in the front line so that they can be shot first! The fact that you would defend this "tactic" is shameful and shows you are not thinking clearly.

There is nothing brave about this tactic!

Why you would want to defend this white supremacist collaborator (in this situation) is also beyond me.

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I asked you once and you never answered, because I am sure it made you angry, but would you fire on American citizens being part of the military? You seem like you are all gung-ho for it.

Did you miss the post on this very thread where I said that I am glad that the Feds backed down before this turned into another Waco?

Let me answer your provacative question with a provacative and truthful answer. When I joined the military, my solemn affirmation was that I would defend my country against all of her enemies, both foreign and domestic.

It is the human nature of some that prevents them from understanding no other language but violence and I can speak that language fluently when necessary. McVeigh and the DC Sniper are two that come to mind immediately.

Bundy and his supporters appear to be of the same ilk as McVeigh, but let's wait for the end of this.

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

The issue is that the Feds took a wrong-headed and strong armed stance, when all they had to do was calculate the amount of money Bundy owed, docket it and then place a lien on the property.

The only people wrong-headed in this situation is bundy and his supporters. The Feds had a court order to round up the man's cattle in response to his YEARS of not obeying the established laws and not paying the fees.

The Feds are not the criminals here. Bundy and his supporters are the criminals.

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

But, no, they wanted to act like Nazi Germany. The American people are not going to stand for it.

Russia is acting like nazi Germany. There is nothing that the American government in this situation has done that smacks of nazi Germany.

You are looking for a cause to be against the American government-- this is not the one.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Why you would want to defend this white supremacist collaborator is also beyond me.

Where there ya go. And you were calling the Republican Party racists? I understand who you are better now, Jermyn. No need for me to respond to anything else.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Where there ya go. And you were calling the Republican Party racists? I understand who you are better now, Jermyn. No need for me to respond to anything else.

You type that because you don't have anything to say that would come against the truth I have presented.

That guy is a white supremacist collaborator-- link already provided in this thread.

Listen!

This guy and his family are all sorts of wrong! Initially, I was giving them the benefit of doubt, but as I learned the details, it became clear to me the type of people we're talking about here.


Even FOX News has called some of the people involved in this right-winged extremists!

The American government is right in this case.

I never called all Republicans racist-- I myself am a Republican.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

You type that because you don't have anything to say that would come against the truth I have presented.

That guy is a white supremacist collaborator-- link already provided in this thread.

Listen!

This guy and his family are all sorts of wrong! Initially, I was giving them the benefit of doubt, but as I learned the details, it became clear to me the type of people we're talking about here.


Even FOX News has called some of the people involved in this right-winged extremists!

The American government is right in this case.

I never called all Republicans racist-- I myself am a Republican.

There isn't much to say after your racist comment.

Were the black riders also white supremacists? You did see the footage, right?