Bush Responsible for 9-11

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Ah, but see how you go from
"satan runs them all" to
"terrorists are responsible."

Do I think Bush was directly
responsible? Who knows, or cares?
Maybe not. That, imo, would be giving
him much more credit than he deserves;
but I can say with confidence that the whole
thing stinks to high heaven.

That you believe that your Gov wasting
3000 citizens is not possible I find ludicrous,
in the extreme, and I could have you bobbing
your head in agreement in about 1 post.

Prolly best if you go with "magic bullet."

Were the Nazis responsible for the Holocaust?
Did Jeffery Dahmer kill and eat his victims?
Did OJ kill Nicole and that young man?

Satan is behind all the evil, of course, but Al Qaeda and the cowards who flew those planes into the Towers are responsible. I don't know what you're talking about having mod my head in 1 post, oh Kemosabie, but its pretty simple to me. No credible source believes in the 9/11 conspiracies.

[canam]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Were the Nazis responsible for the Holocaust?
Did Jeffery Dahmer kill and eat his victims?
Did OJ kill Nicole and that young man?

Satan is behind all the evil, of course, but Al Qaeda and the cowards who flew those planes into the Towers are responsible. I don't know what you're talking about having mod my head in 1 post, oh Kemosabie, but its pretty simple to me. No credible source believes in the 9/11 conspiracies.

[bbyrd009]

Ok, you just wrap that around you
like a warm blanket. Ignore the detonations
on the audio, and the towers coming down
in free fall. We're all whackos--you just
keep watching Fox.

Know that you are in the minority here, however,
at least if what I read is right.

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Ok, you just wrap that around you
like a warm blanket. Ignore the detonations
on the audio, and the towers coming down
in free fall. We're all whackos--you just
keep watching Fox.

Know that you are in the minority here, however,
at least if what I read is right.

Byrd, Not Fox, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, NYTimes, Washington Post, AP, Reuters, BBC, NYPost, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, Time, Chicago Tribune, LA Times, or ANY OTHER credible media source has pursued that the Towers were detonated.

Discovery Channel and others have recreated the situation taking into account the possibilities of detonations. They have all determined it an urban legend.

Who do you have on your side? Ahmadinajhad of Iran! He believes the conspiracy! Morressy of Egypt believes in it. A whole host of whacky websites and whacky celebrities like Rosie O'Donnell.

Doesn't it stand to reason ONE credible, respected journalist or investigative reporter or news source would produce convincing overwhelming evidence that the conspiracy is true?

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by bbyrd009

Ok, you just wrap that around you
like a warm blanket. Ignore the detonations
on the audio, and the towers coming down
in free fall. We're all whackos--you just
keep watching Fox.

Know that you are in the minority here, however,
at least if what I read is right.

There were no detonations on audio lol. There were several TONS of concrete and steel slamming down onto the next level and so on and so on.

I don't watch Fox.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Byrd, Not Fox, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, NYTimes, Washington Post, AP, Reuters, BBC, NYPost, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, Time, Chicago Tribune, LA Times, or ANY OTHER credible media source...

Again with the "credible news source."
Look, I'm not an idiot, I know what it takes
to cause a 100 story tower
to fall to the ground in free-fall time,
which is lots faster than concrete falling
onto lower supported sections, and causing
a complete collapse, which we have no extant examples of.
and please understand that I'm not trying to
change your mind at this point.

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

There were no detonations on audio lol. There were several TONS of concrete and steel slamming down onto the next level and so on and so on.

I don't watch Fox.

And then you woke up.
I also note, wadr, that you ignore discussions with me
in which truth might be quickly illuminated,
"one need not fear evil spirits," etc., and wallow in
...yack. Complete tripe.

Yes, terrorists hijacked your
passenger airliners, and successfully targeted 3 of
your most heavily defended targets, on a day when the whole
Eastern seaboard was supposedly involved in Air Force
maneuvers/training, only there wasn't a single bird
in the air, and all the witnesses are now dead. Can we move on?

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Doesn't it stand to reason ONE credible, respected journalist or investigative reporter or news source would produce convincing overwhelming evidence that the conspiracy is true?

And what do you suppose might happen to that "credible" news source, DB? How do you suppose that a source becomes "credible?" Hmm? Rupert Murdock is "credible," mmmkay?

[bbyrd009]

Originally Posted by deacon blues

Who do you have on your side? Ahmadinajhad of Iran! He believes the conspiracy! Morressy of Egypt believes in it. A whole host of whacky websites and whacky celebrities like Rosie O'Donnell.

This is also untrue. A gross mis-characterization, at best. The majority of the public does not believe the official story, ok?

[Nitehawk013]

You forgot Alex Jones and his infowars nutcases. They too believe 9/11 was an inside job.

As to the majority of the public believing the conspiracy...really? I know maybe 2 out of the hundreds I work, church, fellowship or am family with.