Geithner Backs World Currency

[pelathais]

Why do we think the "Mark of the Beast" is so tied directly to world currency consolidation? I know, the well funded Dispy propaganda machine has been cranking it out there ever since the idea was invented back in the post - WW2 era.

But why do they peddle this? Do you really think anyone on the planet is going to be so stupid and as to implant a "computer chip" of any type in their right hand or forehead?

I've said it before - this isn't the "Mark of the Beast." It would be more like the oozing scabrous open sore of the idiots. Half the implants would be lost the first night when people scratched them out in their sleep.

I've got a ganglion cyst in my left hand that's been killing me whenever it moves around and locks up one of the phalanges. It's less than half the size of any proposed RFID or CMOS chip.

And we wonder why people don't take us seriously when we tell them about Jesus name baptism and the Oneness of God? It's because they're too busy trying to stifle their laughter over all the other stuff we preach.

[Esther]

Originally Posted by Brother David

Why do we think the "Mark of the Beast" is so tied directly to world currency consolidation? I know, the well funded Dispy propaganda machine has been cranking it out there ever since the idea was invented back in the post - WW2 era.

But why do they peddle this? Do you really think anyone on the planet is going to be so stupid and as to implant a "computer chip" of any type in their right hand or forehead?

I've said it before - this isn't the "Mark of the Beast." It would be more like the oozing scabrous open sore of the idiots. Half the implants would be lost the first night when people scratched them out in their sleep.

I've got a ganglion cyst in my left hand that's been killing me whenever it moves around and locks up one of the phalanges. It's less than half the size of any proposed RFID or CMOS chip.

And we wonder why people don't take us seriously when we tell them about Jesus name baptism and the Oneness of God? It's because they're too busy trying to stifle their laughter over all the other stuff we preach.

Every generation thinks they have the answer. Time will tell.

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Brother David

Why do we think the "Mark of the Beast" is so tied directly to world currency consolidation? I know, the well funded Dispy propaganda machine has been cranking it out there ever since the idea was invented back in the post - WW2 era.

But why do they peddle this? Do you really think anyone on the planet is going to be so stupid and as to implant a "computer chip" of any type in their right hand or forehead?

I've said it before - this isn't the "Mark of the Beast." It would be more like the oozing scabrous open sore of the idiots. Half the implants would be lost the first night when people scratched them out in their sleep.

I've got a ganglion cyst in my left hand that's been killing me whenever it moves around and locks up one of the phalanges. It's less than half the size of any proposed RFID or CMOS chip.

And we wonder why people don't take us seriously when we tell them about Jesus name baptism and the Oneness of God? It's because they're too busy trying to stifle their laughter over all the other stuff we preach.

It may not be the mark of the beast at all. But they sure are looting America..

[Pressing-On]

(Excerpt)

Ron Paul's ideas no longer fringe
January 2, 2010

Reporting from Washington - For three decades, Texas congressman and former presidential candidate Ron Paul's extreme brand of libertarian economics consigned him to the far fringes even among conservatives. Not a few times, his views put him on the losing end of 434-1 votes on Capitol Hill.

No longer. With the economy still struggling and political divisions deepening, Paul's ideas not only are gaining a wider audience but also are helping to shape a potentially historic battle over economic policy -- a struggle that will affect everything including jobs, growth and the nation's place in the global economy.

nd his first economics class at Gettysburg College was an eye-opener, Paul said. When a professor explained how banks keep only a tiny part of their deposits on hand and earn money by lending out the rest, Paul discovered one of the "tricks" of the financial system.

Beyond that, Paul's ideas are grounded in the work of economic thinkers from an earlier era who focused on problems similar to those besetting the U.S. today.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...tory?track=rss

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Esther

JD why do you think America won't be involved in the Mark of the Beast?

I was convinved of this by listening to Irvin Baxter.

One of my friends loaned me one of his DVD's and he showed in the Bible how that there is at least one coutry (Jordan) that will not participate.

Israel won't participate.

We (according to Baxter) are prophesied to help Israel.

Along with some other things that he said, he has convinced me that America will not participate in the "mark".

However, he did say that he was not 100% sure.

I want to be ready regardless, but I always believed that if there was a way of America not being a part of it, then we wouldn't.

Honestly, I don't see how America can exist except we exist outside of the forced acceptance of the mark.



I am more prone to think that America will suffer some catacyslic catastrophe that evaporates our existence and/or influence so that the really, really bad stuff happens everywhere else.

Some of the things, when I think about it, can only happen in a place void of God's Grace revealed through the influence of the USA.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Esther

As I said I think this was all planned.

I don't think that you think President Obama is willing or even capable of saying or doing anything good or right.


I still love ya, but I think Conservatives could do more to respect, not necessarily support the President.

After all, that was their biggest complaint of the "left" while GWB was in office. Their actions showed a divided, weakened America, is what many would have argued and agreed with, when speaking of the "left" and the relentless efforts of some on the left to discredit Bush every chance they had.


Now there are folks on the right doing the same thing to our current President, and there are not many (if any at all) calls from the "right" or even the "left" for that matter to stop the disrespect.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Esther

Every generation thinks they have the answer. Time will tell.

I suppose, but no generation before 1840 had an answer to the "Mark of the Beast" thing because before the invention of Dispensationalism the Church had all considered this as having already been fulfilled.

It's really a brand new question in the 2000 years of Church History.

[pelathais]

How about this - why not have someone implant an RFID or CMOS device under the skin of their forehead?

People build these huge fantasy scenarios and attach them with fervor to the Word of God. Irwin Baxter was wrong about the nuclear war that he predicted would happen between June and July of 2007. What has he learned since 2007 to improve his guesstimates?

Remember his "TWO BILLION WILL DIE!!!" prediction?

I'm such a killjoy. Now I've made people angry with me because their desire to see 2 Billion human beings die was not fulfilled. Why do you folks hate life so much?

[SOUNWORTHY]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

I don't think that you think President Obama is willing or even capable of saying or doing anything good or right.


I still love ya, but I think Conservatives could do more to respect, not necessarily support the President.

After all, that was their biggest complaint of the "left" while GWB was in office. Their actions showed a divided, weakened America, is what many would have argued and agreed with, when speaking of the "left" and the relentless efforts of some on the left to discredit Bush every chance they had.


Now there are folks on the right doing the same thing to our current President, and there are not many (if any at all) calls from the "right" or even the "left" for that matter to stop the disrespect.

A person is not given respect, they earn it and your beloved president has failed to do that.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by SOUNWORTHY

A person is not given respect, they earn it and your beloved president has failed to do that.

BALONEY!

First he is our President. To disown him is to disown your own country.

Second, the "left" could have easily responded the same with the same response. That response was not adequate for the "left" and it is not adequate for the "right" either.