Poor man's trademark/copyright pending*APOSTOLICA*

[AmazingGrace]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

But you know

I INVENTED THE AFF....

my tagline says so.

Really now! LOL.... I guess you are more apostolic than the rest of us... but... Tina invented the first AFF LOL she even still has it so na ner na ner

[Carpenter]

Originally Posted by AmazingGrace

Tim... you better postmark that and copywrite it there! Carp will be trying to claim that one too! You know he invents all these big words now days!!!

I know better than to challenge Tim. I would be the mouse in that scenario.

[Carpenter]

Originally Posted by AmazingGrace

Really now! LOL.... I guess you are more apostolic than the rest of us... but... Tina invented the first AFF LOL she even still has it so na ner na ner

...more Apostolic big deal, but certainly not smarter than most. I suppose that the general deriviation of Apostolica was developed from the Term Apostolic Complex, a term I did introudce related directly to the AFF Lexicon...







This is all so silly...

[rgcraig]

Here's a new word for you and I DID INVENT IT

Apostolicea - - Dan's own version of salvation!

[SDG]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Here's a new word for you and I DID INVENT IT

Apostolicea - - Dan's own version of salvation!

Apostolicea is the maximum form of Apostolicness.

Now this neologism has been placed in it's proper context.

[Carpenter]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Apostilicea is the maximum form of Apostolicness.

Now this neologism has been placed in it's proper context.

I would be careful, the implication is that you would have to save yourself according to your own doctrine. You can't even dig yourself out of a simple conversational hole, I would be careful with that eternal soul...thing if I were you.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Carpenter

I would be careful, the implication is that you would have to save yourself according to your own doctrine. You can't even dig yourself out of a simple conversational hole, I would be careful with that eternal soul...thing if I were you.

Talk about attempting to take a higher moral and spiritual ground .... Carp. Try again without the ecclesiastical garb(age).

Last I saw you are the one who built a conversational hole and gave 53521 explanations to excuse a grandstanding myth.

Have you be Apostolicead yet? (used as a verb)

[Carpenter]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Talk about attempting to take a higher moral and spiritual ground .... Carp. Try again without the ecclesiastical garb(age).

Last I saw you are the one who built a conversational hole and gave 53521 explanations to excuse a grandstanding myth.

Have you be Apostolicead yet? (used as a verb)

Dan, you remind me of the kid who walks up and asks, "Mister, how do you like the picture I painted?" to which I respond, wow, that helicopter looks great!" and the kid says, "That's not a helicopter, that's my mom."

If you think that my comment that you dig yourself into a conversational (and intellectual) hole as taking the moral and spiritual high ground...well, I need to go back and reiterate my question about your ability to read...

Dan can you read...really? Or is it more a matter of comprehension?

Also, your "I know I am but what are you?" retorts are kind of entertaining...

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Carpenter

Dan, you remind me of the kid who walks up and asks, "Mister, how do you like the picture I painted?" to which I respond, wow, that helicopter looks great!" and the kid says, "That's not a helicopter, that's my mom."

If you think that my comment that you dig yourself into a conversational (and intellectual) hole as taking the moral and spiritual high ground...well, I need to go back and reiterate my question about your ability to read...

Dan can you read...really? Or is it more a matter of comprehension?

Also, your "I know I am but what are you?" retorts are kind of entertaining...

BUUWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHAA!!!

Dude ... I can't read?

Seems you you really can't categorize, infer... much less decode.

The former requiring higher level thinking skills.

You obviously see your statements as one big pile ... (which of course, I can't blame you)

We are have two basic clauses here that I responded to ....

One that could be construed with being filled with pretension ...

When you said:

1.

I would be careful, the implication is that you would have to save yourself according to your own doctrine.

which resulted in me remarking ...

Talk about attempting to take a higher moral and spiritual ground .... Carp. Try again without the ecclesiastical garb(age).

Secondly, you said:

2.

You can't even dig yourself out of a simple conversational hole, I would be careful with that eternal soul...thing if I were you.

Of which I addressed your folly of not looking at your own hole digging ...

Last I saw you are the one who built a conversational hole and gave 53521 explanations to excuse a grandstanding myth.

This is of course, Einstein, is a reference to the hole you so aptly and deftly dug for yourself by falsely claiming the you invented/coined the word Apostolica ....

---------------------------------------------------

And NOW ... as an added bonus ...

does your recent falsehood and inability to own up to it ... disqualify you from talking about "eternal soul" stuff? Tread carefully now.

How's that for moral, spiritual and intellectual high ground, Junior.

Now wonder Barnum & Bailey let you go.

[Carpenter]

Dan your arguments and logic are so disconnected, nonsensical and full of non sequitors. You want to start over and simplify things for those of us who are highly educated? Really, I want to know what you are saying but I don't follow.