Western District to split North and South - Page 4

SoCaliUPC · #31 03-12-2007, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Yeah...I had my Instant Messenger open and was looking for you. It seems though that it's nearly a done deal. Voted on and sealed so to speak

Yup.

SoCaliUPC · #32 03-12-2007, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Praxeas

lol...Im not sure if this was TIC, however aside from the UCs that don't fellowship those that have "compromised"....I'd say there is a good deal of unity and fellowship. But some things need to change. The sections around here needed to be redrawn years ago

Prax....I am with you, I think there will be a more unified group in the Southern District. I could be wrong, and I really hope I am not, but I do feel like that. Totally unified....no.....but I think there will be more commorodity and fellowship than in the past.

SoCaliUPC · #33 03-12-2007, 06:41 PM

Someone mentioned boundary line. That is presently being looked out. Right now the leaning is for the Southern California district to be comprised of everything from the Grapevine down to the border. There is some talk of including Bakersfield.

Praxeas · #34 03-12-2007, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoCaliUPC

Someone mentioned boundary line. That is presently being looked out. Right now the leaning is for the Southern California district to be comprised of everything from the Grapevine down to the border. There is some talk of including Bakersfield.

That is what I have heard too. Should be interesting