DKB Shares His Vision: Apostolic Identity,

[DAII]

Originally Posted by missourimary

DA, a garment isn't bifurcated until it covers a part of the leg, therefore it is only the boy shorts that had become somewhat popular for awhile that are outlawed.

Sorry MM but bifurcation means the splitting of a main body into two parts ... that outlaws panties too ... maybe even gloves ... most definitely mittens and pantyhose.

[Justin]

Originally Posted by DAII

AI makes it's way to the Pentecostal Herald this month with Bernard ... restating his three Apostolic mantras in his Apostolic vision ..

Apostolic Identity + Apostolic Unity = Apostolic Revival.

To his credit AI in this article wraps up the non-negotiable fundamentals of the WeDeclare Crowd ... with a broader scope in defining AI ...

in contrast to the holiness thrust of his last communications.

In which issue? January? I admit I haven't read it... but I skimmed through it and didn't see anything pertaining to Duet 22:5 and 1 Corinthians 11.

[DAII]

Originally Posted by Justin

In which issue? January? I admit I haven't read it... but I skimmed through it and didn't see anything pertaining to Duet 22:5 and 1 Corinthians 11.

You are correct and you wont find any in the DKB article just a reference to inward and outward holiness ...

As the Apostolic Identity© enters the consciousness ... the writing is on the wall for the Detroit lib crowd ... they will start to trickle out ...

some are disaffiliating churches as we speak ....

We are entering a Golden Age of Re-packaged Conservatism ... that will point to policy and procedure as its guiding principles ... hopefully without a full fledged pogrom... then the pendulum will shift drastically.

[Justin]

Originally Posted by DAII

You are correct and you wont find any in the DKB article just a reference to inward and outward holiness ...

As the Apostolic Identity© enters the consciousness ... the writing is on the wall for the Detroit lib crowd ... they will start to trickle out ...

some are disaffiliating churches as we speak ....

We are entering a Golden Age of Re-packaged Conservatism ... that will point to policy and procedure as its guiding principles ... hopefully without a full fledged pogrom... then the pendulum will shift drastically.

Well.... I'm from Detroit and haven't heard anything... although I do not rub shoulders with any "big wigs".

[Will McLeod]

Originally Posted by Brother David

I would recommend NOT using the things you read on the walls of public bathrooms as any kind of guide for anything, especially if you're on the road a lot and visit truck stops.

I don't think I can come down too hard on either side of the "geber" debate over Deuteronomy 22:5; there's just not enough info to be very dogmatic here at all.

The "abomination" issue is relevant too. Mollusks, ocean and freshwater arthropods and many other creatures are all an "abomination forever" under the Law of Moses.

I'm cooking stir fried shrimp tomorrow. I will be wearing "pants" when I do so, but is it still an "abomination?"

Will?

I must say, I'm fairly tolerant and long suffering with people. I'm even amused by ignorance sometimes. But instead of offering something "factual"......maybe even "some" scripture to argue your points, feelings, doctrine or belief or "lack" thereof, you offer "CHILDISH, IMMATURE" remarks.

I have one question for YOU, friend. I dont ask many....I spend my time answering others.
(?)
Do YOU believe that repentance, baptism IN JESUS NAME, and the INFILLING of THE HOLY GHOST by EVIDENCE of "speaking in other tongues as THE SPIRIT gives utterance" is THE ONLY way to heaven???????

[TroubleMaker]

Originally Posted by Will McLeod

I must say, I'm fairly tolerant and long suffering with people. I'm even amused by ignorance sometimes. But instead of offering something "factual"......maybe even "some" scripture to argue your points, feelings, doctrine or belief or "lack" thereof, you offer "CHILDISH, IMMATURE" remarks.

I have one question for YOU, friend. I dont ask many....I spend my time answering others.
(?)
Do YOU believe that repentance, baptism IN JESUS NAME, and the INFILLING of THE HOLY GHOST by EVIDENCE of "speaking in other tongues as THE SPIRIT gives utterance" is THE ONLY way to heaven???????

You haven't ever had an issue with arrogance have you there, Aristotle?

[Will McLeod]

Originally Posted by TroubleMaker

You haven't ever had an issue with arrogance have you there, Aristotle?

You lack comprehension skills. I have answered the questions posed. I have NOT asked ONE (1) single question in this forum. How is that arrogant?

[Sam]

Originally Posted by missourimary

DA, a garment isn't bifurcated until it covers a part of the leg, therefore it is only the boy shorts that had become somewhat popular for awhile that are outlawed.

Haven't some preached against pantyhose because they are bifurcated?

[TroubleMaker]

Originally Posted by Will McLeod

You lack comprehension skills. I have answered the questions posed. I have NOT asked ONE (1) single question in this forum. How is that arrogant?

Well, somewhere in your vast education, they would have probably taught you how to use applicable words and tenses. For example, if you were only referring to your activity on the forum when you said "I have one question for YOU, friend. I dont ask many....I spend my time answering others", you didn't give any indication of that. A proper way to pose that statement, if referring to your forum activity, would have been, "I have a question for YOU, friend. I haven't asked many...I have spent my time answering the questions of other AFF members."

You see, this way it would have been clear. But when you make the absolute statement, "I don't ask many, I spend my time answering others", you clearly leave the impression that you never ask anyone questions and that scores of people are constantly asking your questions because you know so darn much!

If you need any more help with proper sentence structure, let me know. These principles will also come in handy in proper scriptural interpretation!

[RandyWayne]

Originally Posted by Will McLeod

I must say, I'm fairly tolerant and long suffering with people. I'm even amused by ignorance sometimes. But instead of offering something "factual"......maybe even "some" scripture to argue your points, feelings, doctrine or belief or "lack" thereof, you offer "CHILDISH, IMMATURE" remarks.

I have one question for YOU, friend. I dont ask many....I spend my time answering others.
(?)
Do YOU believe that repentance, baptism IN JESUS NAME, and the INFILLING of THE HOLY GHOST by EVIDENCE of "speaking in other tongues as THE SPIRIT gives utterance" is THE ONLY way to heaven???????

If you ever have a question about man-in-the-middle attacks, asymmetric encryption, spoofing, NAT routing, HTTP, HTTPS, hashing, multi-factor authentication, WEP, WAP, RIP, RIP2, OSPF, BGP, etc.....

I'm your guy!