|
Tab Menu 1
Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
|
|
10-26-2007, 10:52 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
This is par for the course for our Mr Smith. He exhibited the same sort of "argument" in his "article"
A Priori Argument:- More fancy Latin words, literally meaning, "from that which comes before." In argument it is where a person, in an effort to prove a further point assumes the validity of some other point. This other point, it is asked, should be accepted as one that may yet be proven, or which the propounder advances as axiomatic. In other words, one is asked to accept something as knowledge without the benefit of any prior experience (empirical evidence), this knowledge, it is said, comes about a priori. This approach is often the only way to begin any argument, but should not be resorted to during the course of argument; further, one should always bear in mind, that the resolution to any argument, must, of necessity, be dependent on the "beginning assumptions." While there are some things in this world that simply must be accepted without proof as being axiomatic, an assumption or assumptions always weaken one's argument and should be eschewed as a bad practice.
|
Excellent! I am going to research "Priori" now because a lot of my own arguments bring up this issue... I just didn't know there was a word for it.
|
10-26-2007, 10:54 PM
|
|
Smiles everyone...Smiles!!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sparta, TN
Posts: 2,399
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caston Smith
Most certainly. We're not trying to emulate the famous Steve Winter here ....
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmatthew
Well then, not to pick on him, but he does preach something that has no basis in scripture.
|
I'll bump this one time.
|
10-26-2007, 10:54 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas,Tx
Posts: 6,978
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Miller
I hope this is not a requirement. There is NO scripture for it.
|
It is in his church!!! SO WRITE THAT NEW CHAPTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or they will write a stupid song about it!
|
10-26-2007, 10:55 PM
|
|
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,787
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caston Smith
That's just a standard taught in our church.
Hebrews 13:17
Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls.
Our people adhere to the Biblical standards taught, and also the pastoral standards set in our church.
|
It's still just a man made standard. You can't make up what is Holy to God or not. That's not holiness nor separation. That's sin, adding to God's word. The pharisees had that problem too.
And to boot...if what we teach about hair in 1Corinthians is true, that it is her covering then she should wear it DOWN like a veil especially at church or when she is praying
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|
10-26-2007, 10:56 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas,Tx
Posts: 6,978
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph Miller
Sorry, but Jesus never said that.
|
I think we have now established there is now another bible and possibly a whole other god...
|
10-26-2007, 10:58 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Would Bro McMullen consider you backslidden too?
|
Hmm he might ... but all the rest of his big buddies in AMC and stuff are on the Internet. So I guess he'd have to consider them backslidden too.
|
10-26-2007, 10:58 PM
|
|
Da Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Where ever I am preaching
Posts: 1,238
|
|
Someone go get AB to comment here. I think he would have quality comments.
|
10-26-2007, 10:58 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 884
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheltiedad
Excellent! I am going to research "Priori" now because a lot of my own arguments bring up this issue... I just didn't know there was a word for it.
|
According to one dictionary, here are some definitions:
a priˇoˇri
1. Proceeding from a known or assumed cause to a necessarily related effect; deductive.
2.
a. Derived by or designating the process of reasoning without reference to particular facts or experience.
b. Knowable without appeal to particular experience.
3. Made before or without examination; not supported by factual study.
The term itself is used in several genres:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_priori
__________________
Pray for America!
|
10-26-2007, 10:59 PM
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 884
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
It's still just a man made standard. You can't make up what is Holy to God or not. That's not holiness nor separation. That's sin, adding to God's word. The pharisees had that problem too.
And to boot...if what we teach about hair in 1Corinthians is true, that it is her covering then she should wear it DOWN like a veil especially at church or when she is praying
|
It seems to me that a woman is MORE covered with her hair down - than up. Her neck is covered when it's down.
__________________
Pray for America!
|
10-26-2007, 11:00 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmazingGrace
I think we have now established there is now another bible and possibly a whole other god...
|
I resent that Ma'am ... we do not worship any other God except Jesus Christ.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 PM.
| |