A Relevant Holiness Message - Page 38

Pressing-On · #**371** 03-02-2011, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pressing-On; And like my husband said, "Some things I don't agree with, but I'm not going to talk about GP or anyone else."

Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks

••Good for him. Really. The world needs more people like that and I respect him for that. But if every single person in the world were like that, a lot of things in this world would go unchecked and that wouldn't be good.

••The only real difference of you two discussing things between the two of you, and talking about it here on the forum, is the size of the audience.

I didn't have time to address this, but I want to make a final point.

Sure our audience of two is smaller, but not everything is everyone's business nor do you need to drag a large audience in to take care of all issues, especially concerning church matters.

I think you need to carefully choose your audience. 4,000 people viewing who, more than likely, would not have become involved are now involved. Was that the point of the thread?

notofworks · #**372** 03-02-2011, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I didn't have time to address this, but I want to make a final point.

Sure our audience of two is smaller, but not everything is everyone's business nor do you need to drag a large audience in to take care of all issues, especially concerning church matters.

I think you need to carefully choose your audience. 4,000 people viewing who, more than likely, would not have become involved are now involved. Was that the point of the thread?

Or, 200 people who looked 20 times each.

Pressing-On · #**373** 03-02-2011, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks

Or, 200 people who looked 20 times each.

Okay, I'm done with the conversation. Enjoyed it, NOW!!!

Thinker · #**374** 03-02-2011, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks

••The only real difference of you two discussing things between the two of you, and talking about it here on the forum, is the size of the audience.

.
You know, its a fine line with these things, however if things are not said the craziness will continue. I hate the "rock n roll" preaching that is with out empathy for the people. I think if things are not said it will get worse. More will join the "bandwagon"..

If Someone makes public their business, it needs a public response. But if someone will turn and make right their errors we should honor that and support it with the same intensity we used to expose it.

"im just saying"

.

triumphant1 · #**375** 03-02-2011, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notofworks

Or, 200 people who looked 20 times each.

The issue is not one of judging.

A PUBLIC condemnation took place by RM.

A PUBLIC inconsistency took place one week ltaer in RM's church.

A PUBLIC examination of that inconsistency took place in two discussion forums where things are discussed.

The fact of the matter to me is that RM participates here. He has had plenty of opportunity to join in the discussion seeing this discussion is PUBLIC.

Pressing-On · #**376** 03-02-2011, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triumphant1

The issue is not one of judging.

A PUBLIC condemnation took place by RM.

A PUBLIC inconsistency took place one week ltaer in RM's church.

A PUBLIC examination of that inconsistency took place in two discussion forums where things are discussed.

The fact of the matter to me is that RM participates here. He has had plenty of opportunity to join in the discussion seeing this discussion is PUBLIC.

T1,
Rob preached at "his" church. GP preached at "Rob's" church. AI made it "public" by putting a cropped message on YouTube.

DAII · #**377** 03-02-2011, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

T1,
Rob preached at "his" church. GP preached at "Rob's" church. AI made it "public" by putting a cropped message on YouTube.

Your agenda of misrepresentation and half truths shows ... these were made public when the domain owner, which changed yesterday ... published them on the church's website on the world wide web. Please correct this deceptive quote. McKee also televises many of his services.

peyt07 · #**378** 03-02-2011, 12:33 PM

Definition of gossip, which the Bible (I Timothy 5:12, 13) is against: Gossip is idle talk or rumour, especially about the personal or private affairs of others. It is one of the oldest and most common means of sharing facts and views, but also has a reputation for the introduction of errors and variations into the information transmitted. The term can also imply that the news is of personal or trivial nature, as opposed to normal conversation.

Pressing-On · #**379** 03-02-2011, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAII

Your agenda of misrepresentation and half truths shows ... these were made public when the domain owner, which changed yesterday ... published them on the church's website on the world wide web. Please correct this deceptive quote.

His personal church website and preaching videos are not the same as posting in a more "random" public place like YouTube. You have to decide that you want to attend his church or decide if you want to listen to his preaching on the Web. That is all that is about.

YouTube is a totally different arena and story, Daniel. And you know it. I can't, well I probably can, believe you would be so callous.

And your cropping the two messages and dragging it over to YouTube is just way over the top. So don't tell me that you love Rob, because you don't. Friends talk about things - face to face - man to man or woman to woman, if that be the case. They don't drag their carcass out in the road for everyone to run over.

I'm just disappointed in how this is being handled, that's all. I couldn't imagine doing that to someone I said I "loved". I would probably go by and visit or give them a call. I sure in the world wouldn't call them out like a gunfighter in a western town. You are acting like you slammed the saloon doors back and wanted to commence shooting. I just do not like it at all.

Very disappointing. If I don't like how a preacher preaches, I don't go to his revivals. And I sure wouldn't sit around cropping his messages and discussing him on-line. Good grief! Insanity!

kute1 · #**380** 03-02-2011, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triumphant1

The issue is not one of judging.

A PUBLIC condemnation took place by RM.

A PUBLIC inconsistency took place one week ltaer in RM's church.

A PUBLIC examination of that inconsistency took place in two discussion forums where things are discussed.

The fact of the matter to me is that RM participates here. He has had plenty of opportunity to join in the discussion seeing this discussion is PUBLIC.

I hope no self respecting preacher or minister would participate here. It seems to be a very negative place.