Cosmetics???

[Timmy]

Don'tcha miss GodChatCafe, Coadie?

[Lucy Van Pelt]

coadie,

Get a Life!

[coadie]

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Fact: Most feminist DO NOT WEAR MAKEUP!!!!

I have met with Gloria steinham and Jane fonda's X husband in person. There are different dominations of feminism.

Actually Steinham was loaded with make up when she was connected with playboy. Shall we call the over done look a stage one feminist?
When their social prowess and power sags with other things, they often become extremists in other ways.

Of course I can easily name 5 splinter groups for feminism.

all kinds of obsessions burblying out of non godly women.

[Lucy Van Pelt]

Originally Posted by coadie

I have met with Gloria steinham and Jane fonda's X husband in person. There are different dominations of feminism.

Actually Steinham was loaded with make up when she was connected with playboy. Shall we call the over done look a stage one feminist?
When their social prowess and power sags with other things, they often become extremists in other ways.

Of course I can easily name 5 splinter groups for feminism.

all kinds of obsessions burblying out of non godly women.

Who cares!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Lucy Van Pelt

Who cares!

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by coadie

lewdness.
Obviously the bible on many occasions uses whoredoms to describe spiritual fornication. When they come in the church, the loads of mascara draining down the face is quit a sight.

All that pride running down. Obviously that grand application of paints would leave puddles of whatever if they ever went into intercessory prayer in a prayer room. But God can clean them up inside and outside.

Good Lord! Now it's really getting way too ridiculous to even participate.

[*AQuietPlace*]

Originally Posted by coadie

You remind us of paris Hilton.

[LUKE2447]

hmmm let's take a look at the early church fathers and see if they have anything to add to this it's okay to glorify the flesh. I don't think they supported in anyway what many here consider okay. Also it wasn't just one it was across the board. Another point. Because something is common in the middle eastern culture has nothing to do with whether the church or Israel did it.

[Lucy Van Pelt]

Originally Posted by coadie

So you still can't support the painting of the flesh can ya?


4An high look, and a proud heart, and the plowing of the wicked, is sin.

Hollywood.

You remind us of paris Hilton.

I see that! rg is female too

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by LUKE2447

hmmm let's take a look at the early church fathers and see of they have anything to add to this it's okay to glorify the flesh. I don't think they supported in anyway what many here consider okay. Also it wasn't just one it was accross the board. Another point. Because something is common in the middle eastern culture has nothing to do with whether the church or Israel did it.

The opposite is also true:
I dont see where they condemned in any way what some here consider to be wrong.

But that's kind of a weak premise to begin with. I think our teachings should be based on what the bible says, not the early church fathers.

-----------
Luke, if we preach that something is sin, shouldnt we have biblical basis to do so? What biblical basis is there to preach agaisnt cosmetics? Please brother, give us what you think is the strongest scriptural reference on this.