Is The Serpent Seed Doctrine A "Damnable Heresy"?

Originally Posted by StMark

Yes, salvation is in believing in " The Prophet".


The era of the church is over - That came from THEIR MOUTH

Their nuts if they told you that... Bro. Branham taught us salvation comes by the blood of Jesus.. so thats what I'll stick with

Originally Posted by StMark

*** ALSO ***


Some of them teach that IF you even decide to get Baptize, you must be baptized in the name of William Branham!!!




.

St. Mark please stop it... I beg you,,, stop with the mistruths.. PLEASE.. there is a fine line between ignorance of a subject and wilfully misleading.....

The sermons title is "Bruised Serpent" in which Bro. Branham rebuked anyone for doing such nonsense and left the ministry for a while because of such stupidity....... and only returned after it had stopped..

I will ask you to post ONE CHURCH WEBSITE that baptizes in the name of William Branham

Originally Posted by StMark

Are you familiar with the Branhamite churches in Phoenix and Tuscan,AZ?
The ones I know of sit and listen to the tapes only

Preached in most of them and its not the case

[StMark]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Their nuts if they told you that... Bro. Branham taught us salvation comes by the blood of Jesus.. so thats what I'll stick with

come on now Vaughn, you are saying this is the first you have heard of this ????

[TRFrance]

Originally Posted by Sabellius

Good point. That is probably a similar character trait amongst his peers too. Have you followed some of the links? I have. These guys are trying to be pentecostal popes. The burden of proof never shifts, because there is always another spiritual or allegorical explanation....

"Pentecostal popes" , huh?

Interesting phraseology, my brother. Me likey.
I might have to steal that one.
.
.
.
(adding it to my rhetorical toolbox as we speak)

[StMark]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Preached in most of them and its not the case

ummmmmmmmmmmm

Originally Posted by Sabellius

Jesus was justified and thus that made Him the seed of David? That is what you seem to be saying "legally"; "counted as". You should find a passage of Scripture that uses "seed" here and give it some contemplation.

Do you not remember the prophecy in Genesis.. HER SEED.. there's a reason because there was NO MALE SEED involved.....

[JN Anderson]

Originally Posted by Dr. Vaughn

Sir you do realize that your opinion is one among billions... bye the way I am not Calvanistic.... bet that just blows your mind.. just another one of my dizzy circles... oh and neither am I Armenian

I'm certain that it is. This does though decrease your credibility because if that there even a thousand opinions (forget billions) like mine, about yourself, then that should actually tell you something about yourself.

You seem to be thoroughly confused, but what exactly do you believe on that issue. Then again, even the issue of Calvinism/Armenianism is multi faceted. We could be talking about free-will or limited atonement? What does your "view" say of either?

Originally Posted by StMark

ummmmmmmmmmmm

One more M and we might understand

Originally Posted by Sabellius

I'm certain that it is. This does though decrease your credibility because if that there even a thousand opinions (forget billions) like mine, about yourself, then that should actually tell you something about yourself.

You seem to be thoroughly confused, but what exactly do you believe on that issue. Then again, even the issue of Calvinism/Armenianism is multi faceted. We could be talking about free-will or limited atonement? What does your "view" say of either?

Not Hyper Calvin anyhow... my difference is FOREKNOWLEDGE