Tiger Woods Update Thread

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by n david

Gossip Rag InTouch claims Woods and one of his homewrecker's are still hooking up and continuing their affair. They claim Woods had a yatch 500 yards from where she rented a condo.

IF ... such a big IF ... I don't believe the majority of what I see in these rags, but if by chance they're right ... then it shows he's not sorry, he's not interested in doing what's right, he doesn't care about his wife or children or the vows they took. He's a selfish, self-serving jerk who's mad he got caught.

I find it just as hard to believe Woods has been holed up at home watching cartoons and eating cereal.

Riiiiiiight.

That's totally unconfirmed and I'm surprised you'd put that here considering you jumped for posting a link about Danny Gokey's supposed "indiscretions". You blasted me because it was from an unnamed personal friend of his, and no one has posted this Tiger rumor as fact (that I know of), only that it's suspected.

In my personal experience with Tiger, I would absolutely and completely disagree that he's a "selfish, self-serving jerk." I disagree to the point I would tell you that you're wrong and you've made a judgment from a distance that is unfair.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by n david

I agree ... but at some point King David knew he did wrong and made the decision to change. And it cost him the life of a child.

At some point Woods has to understand what he did was wrong and he has to change.

Thus far all I've read ... and again I trust and doubt reports equally - I don't believe he's curled up watching cartoons and eating cereal; and I find it hard to believe he's still seeing one of his homewreckers ... but from all reports, he hasn't recognized the wrong and isn't making changes to correct it.

The bolded statement exhibits your massive bias. From all reports he hasn't recognized wrong? Where are you getting that? That's garbage.

[Cindy]

Good grief, get over it. He is a whore who cares? Let the man live his life. He is not hurting anyone here.

[n david]

Originally Posted by notofworks

That's totally unconfirmed and I'm surprised you'd put that here considering you jumped for posting a link about Danny Gokey's supposed "indiscretions". You blasted me because it was from an unnamed personal friend of his, and no one has posted this Tiger rumor as fact (that I know of), only that it's suspected.

That's laughable. You're link was to a forum and was written by an annonymous individual. Also where was it mentioned he was a "personal friend of his." Need we revisit the allegations? It was a rant against the church and included all of one paragraph about Danny and all of one or two sentences that mentioned he flirted with the female singers. Ooohhhh, Danny flirted how terrible!

Again, I stated I found it hard to believe ... but at least the source of what I wrote is a magazine that could face a defamation lawsuit if wrong.

Originally Posted by notofworks

In my personal experience with Tiger, I would absolutely and completely disagree that he's a "selfish, self-serving jerk." I disagree to the point I would tell you that you're wrong and you've made a judgment from a distance that is unfair.

Your "personal experience" with Woods? You two best buds? Funny you never mentioned it 'til now. Let me grab some popcorn and you can make up, err, share some of your personal moments with Woods.

As for where I'm getting info, ESPN, other news networks. Unfortunately Woods and I aren't tight like you and him are, so I don't have personal experience to draw from.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by n david

That's laughable. You're link was to a forum and was written by an annonymous individual. Also where was it mentioned he was a "personal friend of his." Need we revisit the allegations? It was a rant against the church and included all of one paragraph about Danny and all of one or two sentences that mentioned he flirted with the female singers. Ooohhhh, Danny flirted how terrible!

Again, I stated I found it hard to believe ... but at least the source of what I wrote is a magazine that could face a defamation lawsuit if wrong.

••Yes, an anonymous individual. I gave it not more credibility than the idiots that are spreading garbage about Tiger. My point then was, that there were accusations being hurled at Danny as well as others on the show. That was my point then, and it still is now. It's a legitimate point.


Your "personal experience" with Woods? You two best buds? Funny you never mentioned it 'til now. Let me grab some popcorn and you can make up, err, share some of your personal moments with Woods.

Yes, personal experience. It is what it is. Enjoy your laugh. I actually have mentioned it several times, without specificity. I've PMed the specifics to several. But if you don't believe it, fine. Enjoy your laugh.

As for where I'm getting info, ESPN, other news networks. Unfortunately Woods and I aren't tight like you and him are, so I don't have personal experience to draw from.

No, you haven't gotten any of the information you mentioned from ESPN. They have NOT reported that he's still seeing Rachel Uchitel or that he's a selfish jerk. They don't publish that stuff except in passing when they report that rumors are swirling in internet circles. Tmz.com, omg.com, and sites like them are NOT news networks.

[n david]

GENEVA -- Swiss watch maker Tag Heuer says it will not use Tiger Woods' image in advertising campaigns in the United States for the foreseeable future.

Tag Heuer CEO Jean-Christophe Babin told Swiss daily Le Matin on Friday that the company was reacting to "recent events" surrounding the golfer.

"We recognize Tiger Woods as a great sportsman but we have to take account of the sensitivity of some consumers in relation to recent events," Babin was quoted saying.

This endorsement was mentioned earlier, thought it interesting that they're pulling Woods from all ads in the US. So they're standing with him, but don't want him representing them in US ads.



ESPN Source

[n david]

Originally Posted by notofworks

No, you haven't gotten any of the information you mentioned from ESPN. They have NOT reported that he's still seeing Rachel Uchitel or that he's a selfish jerk. They don't publish that stuff except in passing when they report that rumors are swirling in internet circles. Tmz.com, omg.com, and sites like them are NOT news networks.

You really should get glasses.

The information I posted, and also stated I had a hard time believing, was from InTouch magazine ... which was stated plainly in my post.

I never said I got that information from ESPN. I do get information from a variety of sources, including (but not limited to) ESPN, FoxNews, MSNBC, DrudgeReport, Huffington Post, NYT, Chicago Tribune and other online sources.

When did I mention TMZ or omg.com ... and where did I mention that they were news networks.

I didn't. I never have. To say so is a flat out lie.

Happy Holidays.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by n david

You really should get glasses.

The information I posted, and also stated I had a hard time believing, was from InTouch magazine ... which was stated plainly in my post.

I never said I got that information from ESPN. I do get information from a variety of sources, including (but not limited to) ESPN, FoxNews, MSNBC, DrudgeReport, Huffington Post, NYT, Chicago Tribune and other online sources.

When did I mention TMZ or omg.com ... and where did I mention that they were news networks.

I didn't. I never have. To say so is a flat out lie.

Happy Holidays.

You said, "Thus far all I've read ... and again I trust and doubt reports equally - I don't believe he's curled up watching cartoons and eating cereal; and I find it hard to believe he's still seeing one of his homewreckers ... but from all reports, he hasn't recognized the wrong and isn't making changes to correct it.

I said, "Where'd you get that from?"

You said, "ESPN."

I'll loan you my glasses.

Gotta run. When I get back I'll check in and see what you've called me. I enjoy your accusations and insults. They're energizing!

Merry Christmas!

[n david]

Yes, an anonymous individual. I gave it not more credibility than the idiots that are spreading garbage about Tiger. My point then was, that there were accusations being hurled at Danny as well as others on the show. That was my point then, and it still is now. It's a legitimate point.

Sorry, the rants of an annonymous person are not equal to the published statements of a magazine, gossip rag, newspaper, etc. I don't believe most of what I see in the rags, but at least they're in the open and have to choose their statements carefully as they could be sued. Mr. Annonymous is harder to sue ... especially when the link you gave was a forum where someone on behalf of Mr. Annonymous posted the accusation.

But we could agree that rags are rarely correct. I was very surprised the National Enquirer was right about the John Edwards affair. Everyone was sure they were wrong ... turns out they were spot on.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

I agree ... but at some point King David knew he did wrong and made the decision to change. And it cost him the life of a child.

At some point Woods has to understand what he did was wrong and he has to change.

Thus far all I've read ... and again I trust and doubt reports equally - I don't believe he's curled up watching cartoons and eating cereal; and I find it hard to believe he's still seeing one of his homewreckers ... but from all reports, he hasn't recognized the wrong and isn't making changes to correct it.

True. But it took time for David to get to that point. Let's not condemn and judge him "out" yet. It might take a year or two until God's finished dealing with him. All of this isn't over yet.