Acts 2:38 in 2007 - Page 3

Felicity · #21 02-27-2007, 10:23 AM

Good morning everybody!

Well ........ the truth is that even those of a PAJC persuasion disagree even on the basics in regard to what's what and on the finer points.

It's not about people not agreeing with the Bible. It's about proper exegesis of Scripture. In attempt to "get it right" we come up with different emphases. We have a responsibility to "properly divide" scripture. Like I've said many times you can't hardly get agreement on every point between 2 people. And that is proved on these discussion forums in most every thread on a daily basis.

We ALL agree that every person must repent, be baptized in the name of Jesus and then as the promise was given ..... they SHALL receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Ron · #22 02-27-2007, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity

Good morning everybody!

Well ........ the truth is that even those of a PAJC persuasion disagree even on the basics in regard to what's what and on the finer points.

It's not about people not agreeing with the Bible. It's about proper exegesis of Scripture. In attempt to "get it right" we come up with different emphases. We have a responsibility to "properly divide" scripture. Like I've said many times you can't hardly get agreement on every point between 2 people. And that is proved on these discussion forums in most every thread on a daily basis.

We ALL agree that every person must repent, be baptized in the name of Jesus and then as the promise was given ..... they SHALL receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Yes Felicity, I believe most do agree on these points.

Do we agree though that it is a "Necessity" to get into Heaven?

That is the $64,000 question.

JMHO

Felicity · #23 02-27-2007, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron

Yes Felicity, I believe most do agree on these points.

Do we agree though that it is a "Necessity" to get into Heaven?

That is the $64,000 question.

JMHO

Only $64,000?

Steve Epley · #24 02-27-2007, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity

Good morning everybody!

Well ........ the truth is that even those of a PAJC persuasion disagree even on the basics in regard to what's what and on the finer points.

It's not about people not agreeing with the Bible. It's about proper exegesis of Scripture. In attempt to "get it right" we come up with different emphases. We have a responsibility to "properly divide" scripture. Like I've said many times you can't hardly get agreement on every point between 2 people. And that is proved on these discussion forums in most every thread on a daily basis.

We ALL agree that every person must repent, be baptized in the name of Jesus and then as the promise was given ..... they SHALL receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Look at the Acts 2:38 thread.

Felicity · #25 02-27-2007, 10:29 AM

Bottom line is that if you do those things and of course a bunch of other things as well which we also all disagree on too

..... you will.

Coonskinner · #26 02-27-2007, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

I glad to be numbered with the church and ministry that could just quote the passage just like Peter spoke it without commentary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TB-Dan and crew would need Calvin's Institutes- Luther's Commentary-Southern Baptist S.S. Quarterly-Magee's Safari thru the Bible-Billy Graham's sermon titles-and fourteen more lexicons to explain Peter didn't mean what he said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But we can just quote the SAME answer how refreshing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Safari throught the Bible...ROFL!

That is priceless!

Felicity · #27 02-27-2007, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Look at the Acts 2:38 thread.

Hey there Bro. Epley...... good morning to you sir!

I thought this WAS the Acts 2:38 thread. ?????

SDG · #28 02-27-2007, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Well, I mean, of course Daniel. After all, EVERYONE will be in Heaven - right?
Sweet non-judgemental Jesus would never send anyone to Hell. All that matters is if you are sincere. Uhm wait a minute, if I have to be sincere isn't that a requirement i.e. legalism. Oops strike sincerity.

Nothing is required. It's all good, Bro.

More PAJC propaganda ... your doing a solid job for the UltraCons