America 2016: Free Speech for a selected few.

[n david]

Hahaha! Low information, ignorant Trump supporter got slapped good.

ForumRunner_20160313_133849.jpg

Those claiming Trump's 1A rights were somehow trampled on by the protesters are misinformed and should probably take a few minutes to read the 1A.

[n david]

Justin Amash has also been schooling Trump supporters on Twitter about 1A. He's hardly a leftist. He's the most conservative and best mind in Congress right now. But I'd say it's a hopeless cause though. Most are just too willfully ignorant and won't accept facts. They're too emotional to hear any kind of reason.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by n david

Hahaha! Low information, ignorant Trump supporter got slapped good.

Attachment 5087

Those claiming Trump's 1A rights were somehow trampled on by the protesters are misinformed and should probably take a few minutes to read the 1A.

could he be lying or twisting the truth?

[n david]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

could he be lying or twisting the truth?

Look him up. I did.

The lady deleted her tweet after he dropped the bomb and made her look stupid.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by n david

Look him up. I did.

The lady deleted her tweet after he dropped the bomb and made her look stupid.

she asked an intelligent question, I do not think at all that she was made to look stupid, that is your simple personal opinion.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by n david

Look him up. I did.

The lady deleted her tweet after he dropped the bomb and made her look stupid.

So what if he is actually a lawyer that is meaningless any two bit lawyer can twist the truth or a rule. no biggie.

[n david]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

So what if he is actually a lawyer that is meaningless any two bit lawyer can twist the truth or a rule. no biggie.

Well, he's correct about 1A. Trump is wrong about claiming his 1A rights were shut down. The government didn't do anything to hinder his 1A rights.

[houston]

H.r. 347...

[aegsm76]

I find it disturbing that someone would organize people to "invade" a campaign rally for a candidate they oppose.

In my mind this would be the same thing as:
Carolina Panther fans invading the Super Bowl Celebration for the Broncos.
Pro LGBT activists invading a religious gathering opposed to them.
Christians invading a gathering of Muslim speakers.
Pro choice followers invading a gathering of those opposed to abortion.

In my mind it is one thing to protest outside an event.
It is entirely another to invade the event with the goal of stopping it.
I believe if this happened to one of the "pet" groups of the left, they would be intent on charging those who invaded with "hate" crimes.

[n david]

Why protest then? You don't go to someone you support to protest.

If you're upset with customer service you receive from Sprint, you don't go to Verizon and complain about it. Or maybe you do.

Makes no sense to not protest against and in the presence of the person/company/agency with whom you have a grievance.