Frontline on PBS: ISIS Capturing/Raping Women

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by shazeep

well, you might not like it, but real Muslims are clowning ISIS, and it is the US that will be held responsible for creating them. The blame falls on you, when you blindly propagate lies, and refuse to believe the truth. An inconvenient truth, to be sure, but the real one. Saddam was on US, too.

If you accept the distorted truth of ISIS repping Islam, you have to accept homosexual marriage, and all the other distorted truths promulgated by the same source. Better to just admit that you are a statist, and invested in the system, than to be lukewarm and fence-sitting.

Delusional rants.

So I am to blame for ISIS. I'm responsible for the raping of women and little girls. Blame me for the Civil War too while you're at it.

I'm a statist you say. I say you're a nut, a contrarian, and a lazy internet troll.

Women and children are being raped by ISIS (the I stands for Islamic by the way). Islam allows for rape. It allows for marrying children. It allows for many of the sins of Papa Mo. It's evil, antichrist, and demonic.

Blame the USA, blame me, blame whoever but ultimately you are in collusion with the enemy because of YOUR lies, distortions, and anti-American bais.

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by Originalist

The USA created these monsters with their invasion of Iraq, just as we created Hitler and Stalin with our involvement in WW2. No, we are not a war mongering nation. But we allow ourselves to be manipulated into situations we should have no part of.

Hogwash

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by n david

Do you have a source for this, or is it another of your wild claims with nothing to back it up?

Alternate universe

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by n david

Is there a typo? Unsure how we could "create" Hitler and Stalin with our involvement in WW2, when they were already created and started WW2.

If George Washington hadn't cut down his father's cherry tree---Hitler and Stalin wouldn't have emerged.

[shazeep]

I'm sure the truth is somewhat more centric, like it always is; but the Gov admits to creating and funding ISIS, so you are basically in the position of denying what most everyone else knows. You can't deny that your economy is based on a petrodollar that has lost over 99% of its value, and is backed by the blood of your sons. "ISIS capturing women" essentially amounts to "Americans are oppressing Muslims" however you slice it. Dress it up however you like.

By all means, propagate a "war on Islam;" the war on drugs, and poverty, et al have worked out so well

[shazeep]

Originally Posted by n david

Yeah, not everything found in a Google search is true. Hopefully you know this.


Incredible. You finally found a Google hit which matches your search.

"Via The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies, and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success"

Clergy Person is #8 on the list. Though the definition includes things other than just murder, etc. So it's a bit misleading as to the context of this thread.


It would take too long. I'm at work and haven't the time. You routinely post Google search results of which the majority don't relate to the subject, and you post memes, of which the majority are either misleading or completely false.

well, when i post them is when to say something, nd; they are just perspectives. You do make a good point here, that "psychopath" does not mean ax-murderer; it can be as mild as "acting in your own best interests even when it is obviously detrimental to someone else." And, working up, all hits will by definition relate to the searches made; and i generally don't post the whole search unless it is because a predominance of them help to establish a point. I would of course be acting in my own best interests to cherry pick my preferred link out of the search.

So your complaining after the fact comes across more like the memes bother you in a cognitive dissonance kind of way, but you can't justifiably refute them without sounding like db, veering off into obvious denial. With all due respect to both of you. Is ISIS capturing and raping women? Apparently yes--Muslim women, on the other side of the planet. Does this have anything to do with you? Well that depends; are you invested in the world to the point that you identify with your flag, and your country? Then yes, it does; your country created ISIS, and even admits it--because denying it would be completely pointless--ostensibly to fight an evil, but actually for control of more oil and banking.

And this is hardly a one-off gesture; they have a long and documented history of doing this, and empires at this stage have been doing the same thing since forever.

[shazeep]

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by shazeep

I'm sure the truth is somewhat more centric, like it always is; but the Gov admits to creating and funding ISIS, so you are basically in the position of denying what most everyone else knows. You can't deny that your economy is based on a petrodollar that has lost over 99% of its value, and is backed by the blood of your sons. "ISIS capturing women" essentially amounts to "Americans are oppressing Muslims" however you slice it. Dress it up however you like.

By all means, propagate a "war on Islam;" the war on drugs, and poverty, et al have worked out so well

Oh yes. Everyone KNOWS the USA created Isis. Everyone KNOWS there are unicorns and leprechauns...

[shazeep]

I'm not sure why you take this tack, when it is admitted, and a google search will confirm enough of it to verify it--and not from any "fringe," you can hear the admission from Gov members. Of course the cover story is that ISIS was made to fight "Evil Syria," who turn out to be just people who aren't interested in a Rothschild Central Bank or cooperating with an oil pipeline scheme. But regardless, ISIS exists on your "tax" dollars, at least ostensibly; since they have engineered a way to make petro-dollars out of thin air now, and charge you for them, the result is the same.

You might wish to word the search another way; by all means, put the best face on it that you can https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...ection&es_th=1

[n david]

Originally Posted by shazeep

I'm not sure why you take this tack, when it is admitted, and a google search will confirm enough of it to verify it--and not from any "fringe," you can hear the admission from Gov members. Of course the cover story is that ISIS was made to fight "Evil Syria," who turn out to be just people who aren't interested in a Rothschild Central Bank or cooperating with an oil pipeline scheme. But regardless, ISIS exists on your "tax" dollars, at least ostensibly; since they have engineered a way to make petro-dollars out of thin air now, and charge you for them, the result is the same.

You might wish to word the search another way; by all means, put the best face on it that you can https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...ection&es_th=1

There you go again, Shazy, creating a search in Google, then believing whatever hit your search generates is the truth.

You know the first hit, globalresearch, takes submissions from anyone? It's no more a real research site than Wikipedia.

The hit from Mother Jones only states the US' failed foreign policy has made isis stronger, not that it was created by the US.

QPolitical is a clickbait site, with all the seriousness of a grocery store tabloids - like the ones declaring Big Foot, the Loch Ness monster and aliens exist.

The Guardian states while it believes the US has enabled isis, it doesn't mean the US created isis.

SOTT also takes user submissions.

Infowars is....well infowars.

And Washingtonsblog is a WordPress blog site.

None of these are anything close to actual news or real research. They're either user submitted, meaning Tinfoil Hat Larry down in his parent basement could be writing these articles.

Maybe you should start actually researching a topic, instead of putting a search term in Google and believing whatever comes back is verifiable truth. Are you this gullible, or just really lazy?