Lee Stoneking Today! - Page 3

n david · #21 06-10-2014, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reader

I am sharing only what I read. He did openly state that nothing physical happened.

I wouldn't have given it much thought had a licensed minister in the UPC not corroborated his story in the manner he did.

He only admitted it after he was confronted about it. His initial claim was a lie.

I'm just saying, I wouldn't use his claim against LS, even if there is some corroboration with another minister.

Steve Epley · #22 06-10-2014, 03:39 PM

Not an LS defender or fan but I warn you he will take legal action against you in a NYs second.

Kevin Archer · #23 06-10-2014, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

that is a very serious allegation against a minister of God.

I am not a follower of LS, so it does not affect me whether he is or he isn't but an accusation against a minister of God, needs to have strong evidence.

Amen.

The bible does say:

1Tim. 5:19 Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.

It's a different story when one is in the crosshairs of a slanderer.

Steve Epley · #24 06-10-2014, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Archer

Amen.

The bible does say:

1Tim. 5:19 Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.

It's a different story when one is in the crosshairs of a slanderer.

Yep. And this one has an attorney and rumor won't stand up in court.

n david · #25 06-10-2014, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Yep. And this one has an attorney and rumor won't stand up in court.

n david · #26 06-10-2014, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Archer

Amen.

The bible does say:

1Tim. 5:19 Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.

It's a different story when one is in the crosshairs of a slanderer.

Admin · #27 06-10-2014, 04:57 PM

WARNING - Inappropriate posts have been deleted from this thread for admin review. Please cease from posting any unsubstantiated accusations towards any person.

It is inappropriate for you to express your personal opinion of someones sexuality as fact.

Please take a moment and post like mature adult Christians.

Reader · #28 06-10-2014, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n david

He only admitted it after he was confronted about it. His initial claim was a lie.

I'm just saying, I wouldn't use his claim against LS, even if there is some corroboration with another minister.

The manner in which he went about it was off- making a quick announcement that could lead others to read into it something which was not there, then making some clarification and then going off as he did on some that responded. Facebook surely wasn't the place for it. Then to do that and provide no proof while exclaiming he had it, what was the point? I read all the posts at the time.

Until Gilmartin stepped in and claimed he saw proof and reported it, the posts appeared to be drama. Then it went silent, at least on Facebook. So who knows?