It's Time To Draft Ted Cruz for President - Page 3

Pressing-On · #21 05-08-2014, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fionn mac Cumh

Has anyone who wants this blow hard as their POTUS actually looked at his voting record? Or are they going by how he talks the talk? What was the point of him voting against aid for hurricane sandy victims? Voted NO on reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act. Voted NO on protecting ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes ecosystems.

He voted NO on Sandy because of the PORK involved.

He voted NO on the Violence Against Women act because it is a STATE issue and not a FEDERAL issue.

He voted NO on the The National Endowment for the Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes Act because it is another Federal take over of our waterways (including ponds, ditches and gullies) as well as land - "develop a scheme for oversight of oceans and all the sources thereof..."

Do your homework before dumping a biased opinion, please.

Esther · #22 05-08-2014, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

He voted NO on Sandy because of the PORK involved.

He voted NO on the Violence Against Women act because it is a STATE issue and not a FEDERAL issue.

He voted NO on the The National Endowment for the Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes Act because it is another Federal take over of our waterways (including ponds, ditches and gullies) as well as land - "develop a scheme for oversight of oceans and all the sources thereof..."

Do your homework before dumping a biased opinion, please.

I think fmc is a plant here. You know they are doing that on forums.

Pressing-On · #23 05-08-2014, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther

I think fmc is a plant here. You know they are doing that on forums.

Thanks, I didn't know it, but from the posts, I can see the poster is biased without educated research. So, really this last post shows the person is not an intelligent plant.

And if this person is a plant, they need to be booted - muy pronto.

Fionn mac Cumh · #24 05-09-2014, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther

I think fmc is a plant here. You know they are doing that on forums.

Why cause I dont agree with you? Cause I am not a GOPer? And who is they?

Fionn mac Cumh · #25 05-09-2014, 08:45 AM

Ted Cruz is in the same boat Obama was in before 08. All talk. No experience. Go on his voting record. I dont like it.

Fionn mac Cumh · #26 05-09-2014, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

He voted NO on Sandy because of the PORK involved.

He voted NO on the Violence Against Women act because it is a STATE issue and not a FEDERAL issue.

He voted NO on the The National Endowment for the Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes Act because it is another Federal take over of our waterways (including ponds, ditches and gullies) as well as land - "develop a scheme for oversight of oceans and all the sources thereof..."

Do your homework before dumping a biased opinion, please.

Says the guy who believes in the Benghazi scandal.

Pressing-On · #27 05-09-2014, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fionn mac Cumh

Says the guy who believes in the Benghazi scandal.

These are the questions that Sen. Ted Cruz wants answered regarding Benghazi:

Why did the State Department repeatedly refuse to provide additional security as was requested by personnel on the ground?
Why did the United States not have military assets in place to protect American men and women on Sept. 11, 2012, when there was increased terrorist activity in the region?
During the Benghazi attack, why didn’t the United States send in forces to protect the four men who lost their lives?
In the 19 months that have followed, why has no one been apprehended, and no one been brought to justice?

http://blog.heritage.org/2014/05/06/...ions-benghazi/

Fionn mac Cumh · #28 05-09-2014, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

These are the questions that Sen. Ted Cruz wants answered regarding Benghazi:

Why did the State Department repeatedly refuse to provide additional security as was requested by personnel on the ground?
Why did the United States not have military assets in place to protect American men and women on Sept. 11, 2012, when there was increased terrorist activity in the region?
During the Benghazi attack, why didn’t the United States send in forces to protect the four men who lost their lives?
In the 19 months that have followed, why has no one been apprehended, and no one been brought to justice?

http://blog.heritage.org/2014/05/06/...ions-benghazi/

Stevens himself denied two times, last one being a month before the attacks, additional security.

No forces could have gotten there in time. Thats been proven.

I have no idea on the other two points in your list.

Again, Benghazi is an intelligence failure, not a massive cover up like some think.

Fionn mac Cumh · #29 05-09-2014, 01:47 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...usaolp00000592

Quote:

Lovell answered that they could have done so if the capabilities had been in place, and that there should have been a way for the military to respond. He emphasized that he was testifying because he wanted to make sure that in the future, such capabilities would be on hand. But he agreed adamantly with the Republican-led House Armed Services Committee, whose report concluded that the military did all it could do on that tragic night. "That's a fact," Lovell said.

Pressing-On · #30 05-09-2014, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fionn mac Cumh

Stevens himself denied two times, last one being a month before the attacks, additional security.

No forces could have gotten there in time. Thats been proven.

I have no idea on the other two points in your list.

Again, Benghazi is an intelligence failure, not a massive cover up like some think.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fionn mac Cumh

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...usaolp00000592

I'll wait and see what Trey Gowdy has to say after all of the depositions are taken.