(( Would You File Charges on this Holiness Cop? )) - Page 3

*AQuietPlace* · #21 07-15-2009, 09:50 AM

It bothers me that men think they have the right to critique other men's wives for clothing violations.

freeatlast · #22 07-15-2009, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

That seems alarming to me and my good wife would not appreciate it I don't think.

and how bout, thoereticllay of course, if it was your daughter Elder E. or anyone else.

I'm a pretty big fellow and it would not take me long to whoop this guys

rgcraig · #23 07-15-2009, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace*

It bothers me that men think they have the right to critique other men's wives for clothing violations.

I agree and to take it to the extent of taking pictures and then posting them.......not good.

moniker · #24 07-15-2009, 09:52 AM

Kim Kommando, were charges filed?

Stephanas · #25 07-15-2009, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kim Komando

If a certain con minister was "caught" posting pictures of Apostolic women in "slits" while at a camp meeting and then posting them on a certain con ministerial forum for other men to see - would you file charges on this Holiness policeman? Would this be for harassment? stalking? something else? or just plain FREAKY weird?

Personally, I might be LIVID if this minister was just taking pictures of my daughter's skirt and lower torso.

Boy, all the righteous indignation on this thread has stirred itself up to a real tempest in a virtual teapot.

The simple truth is that the man was taking pictures of "slits" to criticize the worldliness of the campmeeting, and not of women's legs.

This "pervert" talk is just plain silly. Do you think that if he really had a lower leg fetish that he'd post it on a preacher's forum?

He may be dumb, but I really doubt he's a danger to apostolic women.

freeatlast · #26 07-15-2009, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

It is alarming!

Funny though, we've had this type discussion before and were slammed for saying the minister had a problem for doing this type thing.

That musta been back before some of our conservative posters split for that private place on the web for preachers only.

freeatlast · #27 07-15-2009, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephanas

Boy, all the righteous indignation on this thread has stirred itself up to a real tempest in a virtual teapot.

The simple truth is that the man was taking pictures of "slits" to criticize the worldliness of the campmeeting, and not of women's legs.

This "pervert" talk is just plain silly. Do you think that if he really had a lower leg fetish that he'd post it on a preacher's forum?

He may be dumb, but I really doubt he's a danger to apostolic women.

So stephanas, you would be Ok with this man posting a pic of your daughter or wife on the web???????

*AQuietPlace* · #28 07-15-2009, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephanas

Boy, all the righteous indignation on this thread has stirred itself up to a real tempest in a virtual teapot.

The simple truth is that the man was taking pictures of "slits" to criticize the worldliness of the campmeeting, and not of women's legs.

This "pervert" talk is just plain silly. Do you think that if he really had a lower leg fetish that he'd post it on a preacher's forum?

He may be dumb, but I really doubt he's a danger to apostolic women.

It's the self-righteous indignation that always feels called upon to criticize other people's "holiness" that is the problem. It's ridiculous.

rgcraig · #29 07-15-2009, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephanas

Boy, all the righteous indignation on this thread has stirred itself up to a real tempest in a virtual teapot.

The simple truth is that the man was taking pictures of "slits" to criticize the worldliness of the campmeeting, and not of women's legs.

This "pervert" talk is just plain silly. Do you think that if he really had a lower leg fetish that he'd post it on a preacher's forum?

He may be dumb, but I really doubt he's a danger to apostolic women.

Does he need to post pictures to prove his point that "worldliness" has crept in to camp meeting? That's what is weird to us.

I can walk in a room full of 200 people and not tell you who's skirt was split or not - - I don't look.

Stephanas · #30 07-15-2009, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgcraig

Does he need to post pictures to prove his point that "worldliness" has crept in to camp meeting? That's what is weird to us.

I can walk in a room full of 200 people and not tell you who's skirt was split or not - - I don't look.

Hey, I already said it was a dumb thing to do.

It's the wild allegations of perversion that I find silly.