Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified
Yes, and there are also people who have lost their jobs and can no longer pay what they could 2-3 years ago when they filled out their loan applications. Jeff was laid off in April 2009, (a scant 16 months after we bought our first home) and it was scary for a little while. Only by the grace of God and my husband's hard work did we manage to keep ourselves afloat.
Being upside down on a loan or losing a house altogether doesn't always reflect badly on the homeowner, and judgment should be withheld until all the facts are known. (Something some people aren't good at.)
|
I'm upside down on my house. The 2011 assessed value is 28 percent of the mortgage. The guy in the next cube over has an assessed value of 46 percent of his mortgage.
Up until now, my dad has been urging me to hang in there, etc., etc. He thinks I'd walk away--not hardly, I work for a financial institution and at my age I don't want to destroy my credit. However, this shocked him immensely and he has urged me to ask my lender for either a principal modification or an interest rate modification.
However, because I have a job and can make my payments I cannot qualify for any of the existing programs. I'd have to write to the lender and ask it to give me a modification based on the sheer fact that the house they have on their books is not worth what they originally loaned on it, and, in fact, should be written down. And, for all I know, my house may have been already written down, but given what a mess the mortgage system is in right now, there would be no way to tell.
Let me be clear: I have no intention or desire to walk away from my home. But I'm thinking that I should go to the lender and ask it for a modification, because there is little chance the house is ever going to be worth what I paid for it--and because I know the lender is going to eventually have to take a writedown anyway.
Do you all think it's unethical to ask the lender for a modification?