Pre-Election Plans to Attack Iran

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by chaotic_resolve

Ahmadinejad is just a puppet ... according to Iran's laws he has a boss. The real leader in Iran (and commander in chief of the military) is not Ahmadinejad - it's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. And while Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is completely against Israel and the US, it's doubtful he would seek to acquire, or use nuclear weapons against Israel.

It's already a done deal anyway. We and the EU are doing exactly what the US and England did to Japan before the attack on Pearl Harbor. We and other nations are now going to blockade Iran's ports and squeeze them to the point where Iran will have no choice but to attack. Then we'll say, "see, I told you so."

Just a matter of time.

Let negotiations continue. Forget about the puppet and appeal to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the real power of Iran - the people. Blockades and sanctions are only going to hurt the people of Iran, not Ahmadinejad. Negotiating with Iran isn't a sign of weakness, so long as there is no appeasement.

Remember: Negotiation does NOT equal Appeasement.

We all know who the real power is in Iran. and we should all know that the president of Iran is the mouthpiece of the power there.

You assume a great deal when you say the ahatolla wont attack Israel. More than I am willing to.

You also are working with a revised history of WW2 my friend. One I dont recognize. Short of joining the Axis, America was always going to be a target for Japan.

Lets just roll with the understanding that we view this all very very differently.

[chaotic_resolve]

Originally Posted by Ferd

You also are working with a revised history of WW2 my friend. One I dont recognize. Short of joining the Axis, America was always going to be a target for Japan.

Did we not enforce a blockade of Japan?

What would the US do if another country enforced a blockade of its borders?

We both know the answer to these.

[Tyk]

Matthew 24:6And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by Tyk

Matthew 24:6And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

my friend I do appreciate your providing us with this scripture.

alas, if i were to find us a time machine and set it to go back in time a decade at a time, each stop would land us in a period where there were wars and rumors of war.... all the way back to the time of Christ.... yea even back to the day Cain killed Able.

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by chaotic_resolve

Did we not enforce a blockade of Japan?

What would the US do if another country enforced a blockade of its borders?

We both know the answer to these.

so you suggest that the attack on Pearl Harbor was simply a result of our agression and part of a greater plan the Japanese had to dominate the pacific?

I think the evidence suggests otherwise.

[Tyk]

Anyone who is in christ I love as a brother, and I long for us all the fulfill his will and please him! I didn't mean to offer a rebuke at all in this case. honest!

And my heart aches for those lost in sin and deceived by this wicked world. I wish I could save every-one for the glory of god and receive no credit at all! I love them too, but in a slightly different way :-)

God Bless.

[Ferd]

Originally Posted by Tyk

Anyone who is in christ I love as a brother, and I long for us all the fulfill his will and please him! I didn't mean to offer a rebuke at all in this case. honest!

And my heart aches for those lost in sin and deceived by this wicked world. I wish I could save every-one for the glory of god and receive no credit at all! I love them too, but in a slightly different way :-)

God Bless.

I surely didnt take it in a negative way. I do appreciate the reminder of our higher calling!

God Bless.

[chaotic_resolve]

Originally Posted by Ferd

so you suggest that the attack on Pearl Harbor was simply a result of our agression and part of a greater plan the Japanese had to dominate the pacific?

I think the evidence suggests otherwise.

You didn't answer the question ...

We'll agree to disagree, friend.