More for Our Barak Oscama Backers

[ChristopherHall]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Scum artist and dirt bag .... nice.

Truly tells me more than I care to share ....

You never cease to inspire me, Jekyll.

Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

What ever happened with living peaceably with all men, blessing those who curse you, and loving one's enemies? Christians have gone on the war path against anything non-Republican.

[SDG]

Originally Posted by ChristopherHall

Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

What ever happened with living peaceably with all men, blessing those who curse you, and loving one's enemies? Christians have gone on the war path against anything non-Republican.

All in the name of God .... that's what's funny ...

they'll speak like sailors for what's right. Ironic.

Zero crediblity when this is your approach ... it begs for other questions to be asked.

[Jekyll]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Scum artist and dirt bag .... nice.

Truly tells me more than I care to share ....

You never cease to inspire me, Jekyll.

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Of course he can't ... maybe his conspiracy is based on the candidate's birth name .... maybe it's not WASPish enough, perhaps.

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

All in the name of God .... that's what's funny ...

they'll speak like sailors for what's right. Ironic.

Zero crediblity when this is your approach ... it begs for other questions to be asked.

All of this from an individual who's history contains absolutely no credibility other than to provide twisted comedic relief to rational thought.

If one cares to read the whole post, it is an email from an organization, not my views. Funny that you are holding these posts to such a high standard. Your 50,000 posts should be held to a standard so high. Of course holding you to anything is like trying to grab a bar of soap...the soap goes slithering away and all that is left is a handful of slime. Baaad time for a Red Herring. I understand that standard operating procedure is to try to discredit the one asking the question rather than answering the question.

Now BACK to the issue...

How do you vote for a guy who is has such deep anti-Christian priciples as Oscama?

[Sister Alvear]

I stand with the first church and do not vote for any of them...
However,my veiws are outdated so I will express my second opinion...NEVER would I vote for someone that is a member of the church he is a member of...with the record that pastor has...never, never, never...

Originally Posted by ChristopherHall

Since neither party will really address the social issues we talk so much about, it becomes evident that one should vote for which ever candidate they feel will address the issue their family is currently facing. If it is lack of employment, they should vote for the who has a plan to get more jobs going in this country. If it's health coverage it should be which ever candidate appears to have a plan that best covers one's family. Bread and butter issues. If it's war, which ever candidate plans on addressing the war as you feel would be best.

Sorry bud, but these issues are more important than my pocketbook. I vote for the person who most alligns themselves with my family values first. Economy is my second measuring stick.

The Republican Party has done more to stand for Christian family values than you Democrat friends. Have they been perfect? No. However, the Democrats try to tear down the family. I challenge you to find Democratic legislation that is law that protects the family.

Second, the economy. Lower taxes prove to help the economy. President Bush's tax cuts moved our ecnomy forward. The current issues facing the economy is a result of bad credit lending by our nations financial institutions. They always expect the government to bail them out, which we are doing. However, the Democrats want to raise taxes and increase spending on social programs. Social programs never raise revenue, they mostly reward people for being lazy and having dozens of kids. A form of vote buying. We could go on and on about the economy and why small goverment is better than big government.

Well, I am just so appalled at members of this board defending such a liberal anti-family values candidate who has NO executive leadership experience. He has passed NO meaningful (if any) legislation why a 2 year member of the Senate. If I were voting Democrat I would definately vote for Hillary first. At least you know what you get with her. You dont know what you get with a Muslim who claims he isnt one.

[DividedThigh]

i am against obama because he is against me and my faith, enough said, dt

[Sister Alvear]

We cannot stop what is destined to be however we do not have to side with evil.

[Tech]

Originally Posted by Discerner

I dont see how anyone who is a Christian American can vote for this guy. He stands against just about everything we stand for. God bless America!

True.Barack Obama is a Hard-Core Liberal

Barack Obama on Abortion :

Voted against banning partial birth abortion. (Oct 2007)
Stem cells hold promise to cure 70 major diseases. (Aug 2007)
Trust women to make own decisions on partial-birth abortion. (Apr 2007)
Extend presumption of good faith to abortion protesters. (Oct 2006)
Constitution is a living document; no strict constructionism. (Oct 2006)
Pass the Stem Cell Research Bill. (Jun 2004)
Protect a woman's right to choose. (May 2004)
Supports Roe v. Wade. (Jul 1998)
Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)
Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
Voted YES on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Mar 2005)
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance. (Dec 2006)


Barack Obama on Gay Rights :


The politics of fear undermines basic civil liberties. (Oct 2007)
Ok to expose 6-year-olds to gay couples; they know already. (Sep 2007)


Has any marriage broken up because two gays hold hands? (Aug 2007)
We need strong civil unions, not just weak civil unions. (Aug 2007)
Legal rights for gays are conferred by state, not by church. (Aug 2007)
Disentangle gay rights from the word "marriage". (Aug 2007)
Gay marriage is less important that equal gay rights. (Aug 2007)
Gay rights movement is somewhat like civil rights movement. (Aug 2007)
Let each denominations decide on recognizing gay marriage. (Jul 2007)
Supports health benefits for gay civil partners. (Oct 2006)
Opposes gay marriage; supports civil union & gay equality. (Oct 2006)
Marriage not a human right; non-discrimination is. (Oct 2004)
Voted NO on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)
Rated 89% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Tech

True.Barack Obama is a Hard-Core Liberal

Barack Obama on Abortion :

Voted against banning partial birth abortion. (Oct 2007)
Stem cells hold promise to cure 70 major diseases. (Aug 2007)
Trust women to make own decisions on partial-birth abortion. (Apr 2007)
Extend presumption of good faith to abortion protesters. (Oct 2006)
Constitution is a living document; no strict constructionism. (Oct 2006)
Pass the Stem Cell Research Bill. (Jun 2004)
Protect a woman's right to choose. (May 2004)
Supports Roe v. Wade. (Jul 1998)
Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)
Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
Voted YES on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Mar 2005)
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice stance. (Dec 2006)


Barack Obama on Gay Rights :


The politics of fear undermines basic civil liberties. (Oct 2007)
Ok to expose 6-year-olds to gay couples; they know already. (Sep 2007)


Has any marriage broken up because two gays hold hands? (Aug 2007)
We need strong civil unions, not just weak civil unions. (Aug 2007)
Legal rights for gays are conferred by state, not by church. (Aug 2007)
Disentangle gay rights from the word "marriage". (Aug 2007)
Gay marriage is less important that equal gay rights. (Aug 2007)
Gay rights movement is somewhat like civil rights movement. (Aug 2007)
Let each denominations decide on recognizing gay marriage. (Jul 2007)
Supports health benefits for gay civil partners. (Oct 2006)
Opposes gay marriage; supports civil union & gay equality. (Oct 2006)
Marriage not a human right; non-discrimination is. (Oct 2004)
Voted NO on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)
Rated 89% by the HRC, indicating a pro-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)

Wow, thanks for listing all of this out!

I wanted to comment on his liberal leanings, but knew I would need to produce the facts to bolster the comments. You did a great job!

[Sister Alvear]

may God help America if he wins...