I'm in the GloorrrrrrayLand Waaaay!!!! (West Dist Conf)

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Berkeley

It is politics at it's worst!! The meeting in the south was supposed to be to "discuss" a split.. Do you pass around a petition if you're there only for a discussion?

Discuss a split ... and have a vote????

Who organized this event .... who decides what's the South ... ??? Who decides who gets invited to this event .... who voted ... all pastors ??? Or henchmen local licensed ministers who will do whatever their pastor says????

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Discuss a split ... and have a vote????

Who organized this event .... who decides what's the South ... ??? Who decides who gets invited to this event .... who voted ... all pastors ??? Or henchmen local licensed ministers who will do whatever their pastor says????

Not everyone was invited to this discussion where the petition was passed around!!

[SDG]

This meeting has no legitimacy ... or credibility ....

[berkeley]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

This meeting has no legitimacy ... or credibility ....

ahh well.. this is the WD... even those that don't play dirty do...

[Thad]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Discuss a split ... and have a vote????

Who organized this event .... who decides what's the South ... ??? Who decides who gets invited to this event .... who voted ... all pastors ??? Or henchmen local licensed ministers who will do whatever their pastor says????

Dan, this is and was the planned Proceedure.

first there was to be a vote this past Wednesday by the entire Calif.Dist.

following that, a vote by just the southern Calif. preachers.

next, St loius makes the final decision... i think at General conference??


anyhow, we all knew that most of the southern CA. ministers wanted the split so their vote was no surprise. when HeadQs okays the split, no one will be surprised because they have already made it known that they are for it. the only surprise was on wednesday when the first vote took place. however that vote does not weigh to heavy on the decision. it's a done deal. it will split.
I think it will actually give the youth MORE fellowship opportunities !!

[Thad]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

This meeting has no legitimacy ... or credibility ....

yes it did Dan. it was sanctioned and planned by the District. you are off on this one

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Thad

Dan, this is and was the planned Proceedure.

first there was to be a vote this past Wednesday by the entire Calif.Dist.

following that, a vote by just the southern Calif. preachers.

next, St loius makes the final decision... i think at General conference??


anyhow, we all knew that most of the southern CA. ministers wanted the split so their vote was no surprise. when HeadQs okays the split, no one will be surprised because they have already made it known that they are for it. the only surprise was on wednesday when the first vote took place. however that vote does not weigh to heavy on the decision. it's a done deal. it will split.
I think it will actually give the youth MORE fellowship opportunities !!

I stand corrected if this was part of planned protocol ....

Did the district conference take place in the Southern part of California???

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Discuss a split ... and have a vote????

Who organized this event .... who decides what's the South ... ??? Who decides who gets invited to this event .... who voted ... all pastors ??? Or henchmen local licensed ministers who will do whatever their pastor says????

The letter announcing both Northern Voting at District Conference, and Southern Voting for those not able to attend the conference was sent from St Louis.

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

I stand corrected if this was part of planned protocol ....

Did the district conference take place in the Southern part of California???

No, only the discussion on the Division.

[BoredOutOfMyMind]

I have a scan of the letter if anyone is interested.