__________________
People who are always looking for fault,can find it easily all they have to do,is look into their mirror.
There they can find plenty of fault.
I'd love to see a well known and respected publisher produce a modern version of the Bible much like the ESV that has Matthew 28:19 worded closer to the original, "Go and make disciples of all nations in my name". I think that would be awesome to preach from. It would also drop a bomb in the theological community at large. Another "Great Debate" could begin. Hey...that might ignite a revival of Apostolic truth.
There is a Bible called a truth bible,a brother puts out.
__________________
People who are always looking for fault,can find it easily all they have to do,is look into their mirror.
There they can find plenty of fault.
If thousands of individuals over several hundred years and who are a lot smarter than me weren't inspired enough by God to give us a true translation of the bible, I doubt that I could do any better.
I guess we'll just have to live with flawed bibles.
That Brother's name was Connor,I think his first name was William or something but I'm not really sure,but I have saw this online before but it's been awhile.
__________________
People who are always looking for fault,can find it easily all they have to do,is look into their mirror.
There they can find plenty of fault.
If thousands of individuals over several hundred years and who are a lot smarter than me weren't inspired enough by God to give us a true translation of the bible, I doubt that I could do any better.
I guess we'll just have to live with flawed bibles.
Actually, they aren't more intelligent than we are. We have far more ancient manuscripts at our disposal than they did. Many of these ancient manuscripts have been found, reviewed, and studied only within the last 200 years.
When you have a plethora of ancient manuscripts pre-dating the 15th century and often stretching back to the 3rd and 4th centuries that agree in so many ways that contradict our traditional translations... it really discredits the traditional translations dating from the Reformation.
Actually, they aren't more intelligent than we are. We have far more ancient manuscripts at our disposal than they did. Many of these ancient manuscripts have been found, reviewed, and studied only within the last 200 years.
When you have a plethora of ancient manuscripts pre-dating the 15th century and often stretching back to the 3rd and 4th centuries that agree in so many ways that contradict our traditional translations... it really discredits the traditional translations dating from the Reformation.
When do you think we'll finally get a bible that's error free?
When do you think we'll finally get a bible that's error free?
The original was error free. Do you mean translations that are error free?
19Darum gehet hin und lehret alle Völker und taufet sie im Namen des Vaters und des Sohnes und des heiligen Geistes,
Engrish is my second language. In the German, Luther translated from the Latin. Many languages have changed and migrated to different expressions over the years. Luther didn't have an anti oneness agenda. There were in his time no Oneness to "push back"
Now to my point, checking for variance in other old oriiginal translations tell us also when some change occured. Luther was 1545 before the KJV.
Linear Mode
