Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #261  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:32 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified View Post
In the case of the twins I mentioned, only the twins were gay. They had two brothers who were heterosexual. Four boys, raised in the same environment, two are straight, the twins are homosexual.
They removed homosexuality and neurosis from the DSM II and IV. Twin studies are all vaery important. Twins are dress the same, look the same and play wuith each other. They have most nearly identical environments and temperaments. This gay feature should run 100% identical.

Quote:
More than 70 percent of the depressed twins had alcohol problems at some time in their lives, as did 67 percent of the nondepressed twins. In twin pairs where neither had depression, the lifetime rate of alcohol abuse or dependence was 53 percent. Those rates are much higher than in the general population, where the prevalence of alcohol problems is closer to 30 percent.
http://wupa.wustl.edu/record_archive...0-97/1026.html

A study of identical twins showed that a twin will develop clinical depression more than 75 percent of the time if the other has been diagnosed.

If raised appart, it runs 67%

http://www.allaboutdepression.com/cau_03.html
Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:00 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Coadie, I'm of the opinion that you may very well be left in the flat earth catagory after science advances in all this research.

Psychology is a quack science anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:18 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
Coadie, I'm of the opinion that you may very well be left in the flat earth catagory after science advances in all this research.

Psychology is a quack science anyway.
I have formal and advanced education in Psychology. I agree with you. When in an inpatient clinical rotation, I decided it was a way to make money on people's misery. Psychiatry as a field that has a horrible cure rate. My experience in neuro surgery tells me that "only surgeons cure" may be more accurate.

I was taught that neurotics build castles in the skies. Psychotics live in castles in the sky and Psychologists collect rent.
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 09-01-2010, 02:37 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Quote:
Originally Posted by coadie View Post
I have formal and advanced education in Psychology. I agree with you. When in an inpatient clinical rotation, I decided it was a way to make money on people's misery. Psychiatry as a field that has a horrible cure rate. My experience in neuro surgery tells me that "only surgeons cure" may be more accurate.

I was taught that neurotics build castles in the skies. Psychotics live in castles in the sky and Psychologists collect rent.
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 09-01-2010, 02:50 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
I've read about blind tests with pharmones. Those who were reportedly "gay" biologically reacted to blind samples of same gender pharamone while those who were not biologically reacted to opposite gender pharamone.

It's called, "chemistry". It's in our biology. I'd say that their biology leaves them predisposed to this attraction given a biological component.

All this would mean is that they need a divine touch both spiritually, emotionally, and physically for wholeness according to the biblical perspective.
College freshmen take basic psychology and cover Pavlovs dogs. With reinforcement, we can create stimulus and response. Gays have a history of sniffing other gays? Your experiment can't rule out previous reinforcement of stimuli.

Not true at all. It also is not called chemistry. I could see my kids begin to salivate when they smelled their favorite starbursts. If they did n't have a previous association with the smell, there would have been no reaction. Again see Pavlovs dogs.
pheromone???

Homophilia apologetics.

Oh by the way, how did you measure "react"?

No link or data again.
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 09-01-2010, 04:17 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Now... we know someone could run with this one...
Luke 17:34-35 (King James Version)
34I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
35Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
Reply With Quote
  #267  
Old 09-02-2010, 11:40 AM
berkeley berkeley is offline
Saved & Shaved


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 10,795
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila View Post
Now... we know someone could run with this one...
Luke 17:34-35 (King James Version)
34I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
35Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
Reply With Quote
  #268  
Old 09-02-2010, 01:14 PM
coadie coadie is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,889
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Berkley View Post
Other dance Moves besides grinding or 2 step or booty shaking

Quote:
Luke 17:34-35 (King James Version)
34I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
35Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
Grinding is an example of using the culture to interpret scripture

Gay marriage is justified by using modern culture to interpret scripture.
Reply With Quote
  #269  
Old 09-02-2010, 01:45 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

I know Coadie... it was a joke. lol

The issue at hand is that psychology really is only guessing. The Bible says that we're born with a sin nature (meaning predisposition to sin). Gay people say that they were born gay. Is gay relations sin? Yes. So they are essentially saying that they were born sinners with a predisposition to this sin. The agree with the Bible. We're all in the very same boat regardless of predisposition.

The answer isn't condemning them. The answer is loving them as people and introducing them to Jesus. From there they are his.
Reply With Quote
  #270  
Old 09-02-2010, 04:41 PM
UltraCon UltraCon is offline
Old Codger


 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 51
Re: Gay Marriage: For or Against?

Its a sin. They are going to hell. plain simple Bible fact.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JW Marriage Situation. Scott Hutchinson Prayer Closet 0 08-02-2010 12:12 PM
How did you propose marriage? Margies3 Fellowship Hall 31 03-06-2009 12:14 PM
Same Sex Marriage Sam Fellowship Hall 0 02-06-2009 06:28 PM
Question about marriage franklyn4 Deep Waters 93 01-15-2009 10:23 PM
Gay Marriage Dedicated Mind Fellowship Hall 43 11-18-2008 10:14 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.