Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #231  
Old 05-02-2010, 10:43 AM
bkstokes's Avatar
bkstokes bkstokes is offline
Jesus is the Christ


 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,484
Re: Not Saved?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Right.
The 120 who received the Holy Ghost Baptism on the Day of Pentecost as recorded in Acts 2:1-4 did not receive their salvation experience that day. They had already been believers for some time. Some had been disciples for 3 years and others for less. They (the 120) were part of the 500 member "Church/Assembly/Group) that had personally seen and believed in the resurrected Christ (ref 1 Cor 15:6) some 50 days before Pentecost. The experience they received that day was an enduement of power (Acts 1:4-8) or a clothing with power (Luke 24:49).

In the early church in the case of the Samaritans (Acts 8), the Ethiopian eunuch (Acts 8), Saul (Acts 9), Cornelius (Acts 10) and the Baptist believers in Acts 19 were all saved before they were baptized in water and in the Holy Spirit.

When the Holy Spirit fell upon people in the late 1800's in various areas and then in the early 1900's in Kansas, Texas, California, and on into the whole world, the folks who received their Baptism in the Spirit or their personal Pentecost were already saved before the Spirit came upon them with power and with tongues. Even when the UPC was formed in 1945 it was not the belief of that organization that the Holy Ghost Baptism with tongues was the new birth or getting saved. Yes, some believed that way but most of the persons in leadership did not. The first General Superintendent (Howard Goss); the first Sunday School Superintendent (E.E. McNatt); the first Foreign Missions Director (Wynn Stairs) and some of the others on the General Board such as C.H. Yadon and W.M. Greer all believed that salvation or the new birth happened prior to water and Spirit baptism. The idea that Acts 2:38 is the same as the new birth is an idea that came into popularity later in the UPC.

It's just as Pelathais said as quoted above. The idea that speaking with tongues is the same as getting saved is not taught in the Bible; is not taught during the history of the Church; and was not part of the Apostolic message until recently. It is NOT old time Apostolic/Pentecostal teaching.
I haven't read the whole thread, but this was quote really stuck out to me. Good one Sam.
__________________
If ye believe not that I AM, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24

Mone me, amabo te, si erro

No real problem exists over the use of "The Name" in everthing else done in the Church. Why then should there exist great controversy over the use of the "The Name of the Godhead" in water baptism?
Kevin J. Conner The Name of God p. 92
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are you sure you're saved? Timmy Fellowship Hall 175 03-16-2014 07:32 AM
Once saved always saved MrsMcD Deep Waters 20 01-27-2009 08:10 PM
What do you HAVE to believe to be saved? Sept5SavedTeen Fellowship Hall 44 11-26-2008 11:31 AM
Are You Really Saved ? Joelel Deep Waters 82 04-04-2007 07:35 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.