Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Sanctuary > Deep Waters
Facebook

Notices

Deep Waters 'Deep Calleth Unto Deep ' -The place to go for Ministry discussions. Please keep it civil. Remember to discuss the issues, not each other.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #231  
Old 04-25-2007, 04:34 PM
Chan
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrotherEastman View Post
Just because I said that Acts 2:38 is an important scriptural passage, doesn't necessarily mean that it is more important than any other. Yep, you are definately a good liberal that likes to read into what others are saying. Liberals are good at reading into things you know.
But aren't ALL scriptural passages important? Isn't ALL scripture given by inspiration of God?
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old 04-25-2007, 04:35 PM
BrotherEastman's Avatar
BrotherEastman BrotherEastman is offline
uncharismatic conservative maverick


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
But aren't ALL scriptural passages important? Isn't ALL scripture given by inspiration of God?
Absolutely.
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old 04-25-2007, 04:38 PM
Jack Shephard's Avatar
Jack Shephard Jack Shephard is offline
Strange in a Strange Land...


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Island
Posts: 5,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrotherEastman View Post
Just because I said that Acts 2:38 is an important scriptural passage, doesn't necessarily mean that it is more important than any other. Yep, you are definately a good liberal that likes to read into what others are saying. Liberals are good at reading into things you know.
I am not reading into nothing. I was telling you that I answered your question a couple of pages ago
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old 04-25-2007, 04:46 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
I posted where a lady sent Acts 2:38 to universities all over Amercia-Canada-Athens, Greece to the language departments asking about "eis" in Acts 2:38 ALL of them without exception stated it meant "in order to or into NOT because of." It did not matter one bit to these 'faith only Baptist' they care less what the Bible teaches.
Just like Dan won't answer the question because he knows he is caught.
Not only are they wrong they are not honest. Sincerity is not what they are about!
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old 04-25-2007, 04:52 PM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
I posted where a lady sent Acts 2:38 to universities all over Amercia-Canada-Athens, Greece to the language departments asking about "eis" in Acts 2:38 ALL of them without exception stated it meant "in order to or into NOT because of." It did not matter one bit to these 'faith only Baptist' they care less what the Bible teaches.
Just like Dan won't answer the question because he knows he is caught.
Not only are they wrong they are not honest. Sincerity is not what they are about!
I'm sure documentation from each one of these "theological/language" experts are safely in your hands ....
Reply With Quote
  #236  
Old 04-25-2007, 04:53 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
I'm sure documentation from each one of these "theological/language" experts are safely in your hands ....
I posted them you could check them yourself. I gave the names of the professors and the universities you know I did.
Reply With Quote
  #237  
Old 04-25-2007, 04:55 PM
Jack Shephard's Avatar
Jack Shephard Jack Shephard is offline
Strange in a Strange Land...


 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Island
Posts: 5,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
I posted them you could check them yourself. I gave the names of the professors and the universities you know I did.
Posted where?
Reply With Quote
  #238  
Old 04-25-2007, 05:10 PM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTULLOCK View Post
Posted where?
I have posted them several times on various threads and it meant nothing. They were only universities like Berkley-Harvard-University of Athens little ols po dunk colleges like that. But did it matter???????????? Nope they ignored them. No one is as blind as those who will not see. Paul spoke of not recieving the love of the truth and instead a spirit of delusion getting some folks.
Reply With Quote
  #239  
Old 04-25-2007, 05:11 PM
mizpeh mizpeh is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTULLOCK View Post
Extra stuff...I would not call it extra stuff. The word we are saved by grace through faith. I mean think about it. Some would say faith in Acts 2:38 is what saves you...Maybe, but it is faith in christ alone. Acts 2:38 is our reaction to the Message. I believe Acts 2:38 signifies that the salvation process is complete.
I have been thinking about this for sometime now.

There are two verses that explicitly state that baptism saves us and there is one verse that says we don't belong to Christ without his Spirit. I think some folks discount these.

There is the question of new birth, water and Spirit. I think some folks twist these to fit their theology.

Then there are all the examples in Acts of unbelievers coming to faith and what was involved. I think some folks don't have answers to why Paul asked "have you received the Holy Spirit since you believed?" and a couple of other things that don't quite match up with grace alone by faith alone.

I don't discount what Christ did on the cross or his burial or his resurrection and the work of grace God does in drawing us to himself. Nor do I discount faith, but believing the gospel is the same as obeying the gosple and it is not salvation it leads to salvation. Without faith no one would repent or be baptized etc.
Reply With Quote
  #240  
Old 04-25-2007, 05:14 PM
mizpeh mizpeh is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTULLOCK View Post
Posted where?
JT, I found these on the COC forum on CARM. I think Bro Elpey has a similar list.



One will notice in the list of scholars below that there is not a single one that is listed as a member of the church of Christ:

Professor Tyler (Amherst College, Mass.), said, “I shall translate 1. Acts 2:38 liberally, thus: ‘Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in (or on) the name of Jesus Christ unto remission of sins.’ The preposition eis seems to denote the object and end of the two verbs which precede in the imperative. In other words, REMISSION OF SINS IS THE OBJECT AND END RESULT of repentance and baptism.”

Professor H.C. Cameron (Princeton College, NJ) said, “The preposition eis in Acts 2:38 is evidently used in its final sense; and the phrase is clearly connected with metanoeesate kai baptistheeti (repent and be baptized), AS THE END TO WHICH REPENTANCE AND BAPTISM IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST LED.”

Professor Packard (Yale College, Conn.) said, “My own impression (to give it for what it is worth) is that I should translate it, if these words occurred in Plato, for instance, TO THE END OF REMISSION OF SINS. It would then make aphesis hamartioon AN OBJECT AIMED AT, OR A RESULT ATTAINED BY THE ACTS DENOTED BY THE VERBS.”

Professor Foster (Colby University, Maine) said, “Without a special examination of the passage in connection with others in which like expressions occur, I should say that the word here has the force of ‘unto,’ ‘in order to,’ ‘for the sake of,’ INDICATING A RESULT TO BE ATTAINED.”

Professor D’Ooge (Ann Arbor University, Mich.) said, “In reply to your inquiry, I would say that in my judgment the preposition eis, in the verse referred to, expresses THE RELATION OF AIM OR END IN VIEW, answering the question eis ti (for what?), and to be translated by ‘unto,’ ‘in order to,’ ‘for.’ This sense of eis, as you doubtless know, is recognized by Liddell & Scott for classical; by Winder, for New Testament usage.”

Professor Flagg (Cornell University, NY) said, “In answer to your inquiry about the force of the preposition eis in the passage of the New Testament to which you refer (Acts 2:38), I should say that IT DENOTED INTENTION OR PURPOSE, ‘with a view to,’ much as if he had been written, ‘SO AS TO OBTAIN REMISSION OF SINS.’”

Professor Proctor (Dartmouth College, NH) said, “It is my opinion that eis is to be connected with both the predicates, and that IT DENOTES AN OBJECT OR END IN VIEW.”

Professor Harkness (Brown University, RI) said, “In my opinion eis in Acts 2:38 DENOTES PURPOSE, and may be rendered in order to, or FOR THE PURPOSE OF SECURING, or, as in our English version, for.”

Professor T.D. Seymour (Yale College) said, “I do not remember any passage in which eis could properly be translated because of. I am not sure that I understand your second question; as I understand it, I should say that EIS IS NEVER RETROSPECTIVE, it always implies that the person or thing or act concerned is turned toward the thing which follows eis.”

Professor W.W. Goodwin (Harvard) said, “In reply to your first question I must say that I cannot conceive of any expression in which eis would be properly translated because of. To your second question I should say that I DO NOT SEE HOW EIS CAN EVER BE RETROSPECTIVE.”

Professor John H. Wheeler (University of Virginia) said, “It seems to me in either language (Greek or English) THE REMISSION OF SINS IS SOMETHING TO WHICH THE ONE WHO IS BAPTIZED IS TO LOOK FORWARD - he is to be baptized AS A MEANS OF PROCURING THAT REMISSION.”

Professor Chas. F. Smith (Vanderbilt) said, “I do not doubt that eis in Acts 2:38 means unto and is prospective.”

In addition to all of the above, Dr.Williams, translator of The Williams Testament said eis “is always prospective.”

Still another list and not one is given as a member of the church of Christ:

The following is a list of Greek scholars (and I have no further information on these besides what I’ve included) who commented on Acts 2:38 and the meaning of baptism for (eis) the forgiveness of sins:

1. Winer, Greek scholar, Winer’s New Testament Grammar, “the purpose and end in view”

2. J.W. Willmarth (Baptist), scholar, “unto, in order to”

3. Hackett (Baptist), scholar, referring to Acts 22:16 “states a result of baptism, answers ‘for the remission of sins’ in Acts 2:38, i.e., submit to the rite in order to forgiveness”

4. Meyer “denotes object of baptism which is the remission of guilt”

5. Penick, professor of classical languages at the University of Texas, “’eis’ looks forward and I know of no case in the New Testament where it looks back”

6. C.B. Williams (Baptist) “eis is always prospective”. His translation: “that you may have your sins forgiven.”

7. J.P. Lange (Lutheran theologian) “eis shows the immediate purpose of baptism”

8. Olshausen, “baptism is accompanied with the remission of sins”

9. C.H. Morgan (Baptist), Dean of Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary “I do not know of any recognized Greek lexicon which gives to eis the meaning of ‘because of’.”

10. W.R. Harper, Professor at Chicago University, “’unto’, i.e., ‘in order to secure’”

11. Axtell (Baptist), Professor of Greek, ‘unto, for, in order to, with a view to, denotes the object or end toward which the action expressed by the predicate verbs was to be directed.”

12. S.H. Butcher (Presbyterian), Professor of Greek, “expresses the end toward which the action tends”

13. I. Bywater, Professor of Greek, “expresses the end or purpose to be attained: to the end that your sins may be remitted.”

14. H.C. Cameron, Professor of Greek, “the end to which repentance and baptism in the name of Jesus Christ led”

15. P. Doddridge (Congregationalist), “in order to be forgiven of their sins”

16. M.L. D’Ooge (Baptist), Professor of Greek, “unto, in order to, for”

17. K. Fullerton (Presbyterian), Professor of Greek and Hebrew scriptures “into or unto, the aim or end of baptism is remission of sins”

18. G.S. Sale (Presbyterian), Professor of Greek, “result or purpose of baptism, to obtain remission of sins”

19. C.F. Sitterly (Methodist), Professor of Greek and English Bible, “reason or motive that should induce to repentance and baptism”

20. J.H. Thayer (Congregationalist), Professor of N.T. Criticism and Interpretation, author of Thayer’s Greek Lexicon, “unto the remission of your sins”

21. R. Halley (Congregationalist), Principal of New College, “future and prospective”

22. A. Harkness (Baptist), Professor of Greek, “denotes purpose, in order to, for the purpose of receiving”

23. J.C. Proctor, Professor of Greek, “denotes object or end in view”

24. W. S. Tyler, Professor of Greek, “denotes object and end of the two verbs”

I know nothing more about the above than what is given. I believe my brethren collected these lists originally from others who were NOT members of the CoC for the express purpose of ruling out bias, to show that unbiased scholars knew that eis looks forward and not back to something (as in because).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Acts 2:38 your god? SDG The D.A.'s Office 438 09-16-2010 07:00 PM
Calling all PAJCers: When does Justification and Remission Happen? SDG The D.A.'s Office 353 05-30-2008 01:39 PM
book of acts revival brazil Rev. Raul Alvear Jr Missions Area 10 03-06-2007 08:11 PM
Acts 2:38 in 2007 Nahum Deep Waters 82 02-27-2007 02:17 PM
book of acts revival brazil Rev. Raul Alvear Jr Missions Area 2 02-25-2007 10:38 AM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.