Supreme Court to Hear Case on Obama

[coadie]

Originally Posted by MikeinAR

A legal problem of the Democratic party huh? The Republican party had no recourse on the matter, you suppose?

Just to be clear in your legal dissertation to us all coadie, you're stating that the ONLY party in position to challenge Barack Obama's citizenship qualifications for the Presidency are the members of his own political party?

You're claim is that the only means of a legal remedy for a citizenship objection is for a member of a politician's OWN party to take him to court??

The opposition party (or a complainant associated with the opposite party) could never have brought the matter before a Federal court??

You're logic leaves much to be desired if you truly believe that.

By your insertion of the word ONLY you have turned it into a lie.

It is the duty of the dems.
The Dems seem to be irresponsible.

Can you explain why the Dems as a party and not Hillary alon didn't put the heat on Obama? Fear? Stupidity?

Just general malfeasance?

He lies about which hospital is his place of birth.

How do democrats define 'red flags"?

The Case Against Barack Obama, by author David Freddoso

This is a great book on the scams deciept and crime in Obama's Chicago tour.
Having read the book, it helps me understand people like yourself that love him.

Culture of Corruption by Michelle Malkin will also be vivid.

The Democrats haven't had a President that wasn't impeached since the 70's.

I see the day is closer when Obama will face what is his greatest fear. False witness, fake/forged documents are serious.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by oletime

the words dan rather come to mind ?

In Hawaii, WND was able to locate at the Honolulu public library microfilm of a notice placed in the Sunday Advertiser Aug. 13, 1961. The announcement in the "Births, Marriages, Death" section read: "Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4."

Baro also sent investigators to the newspaper offices to examine files, but the Advertiser could not confirm who actually placed the ad.

According to Baro's affidavit, Beatrice Arakaki affirmed she was a neighbor of the address listed. She has lived at her current residence of 6075 Kalanianaole Highway from before 1961 to the present.

Moreover, Arakaki said she believed that when Obama lived with the Dunhams, his grandparents, the family address was in Waikiki, not on Kalanianaole Highway.

Baro was able to determine the previous owners of the residence at 6085 Kalanianaole Highway – the alleged address of Obama's parents when he was born – were Orland S. and Thelma S. (Young) Lefforge, both of whom are deceased.


1 anyone can place a birth announcement.
2 It is not safe to assume the birth announcement ad is correct
3 There were lies on the marriage certificate 6 months before the birth announcement The big one was Obama was still married
4 Someone assumes people own a house and someone else lived there.
Housing is expensive in HI and I don't assume people have multiple residences.
5 It's feasible the couple occupied the back cottage at 6085 Kalaniana'ole.
6 Public records from the time show that Barack H. Obama, 25, had a residence at 625 11th Ave. in Kaimuki.
7 I have not seen a marriage certificate. Since stanly was pregnant and it was a problem, I can see them claiming they were married. Then she would have to "claim" to get a divorce. I don't know if there was one recorded.
8 I believe a woman would leave a man if he was "out of town" in school thousands of miles away and if she found out he had some wife action even further away.
9 Having multiple wives can get sticky. Having multiple ex wives is usually sticky

[coadie]

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...811090361/1001

November 9, 2008 story by the large HI paper on Obama. This story ran concurrently while on Obama's President elect web site he was claiming birth at Queens. He needs to check the paper to see where he was allegedly born?

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by Newman

1. I believe the citizenship issue is so unbelievable that the Republicans didn't investigate it early on. Nobody wanted to be called racist for checking out such a basic fact when it began to raise its head (too late in the game).

Finally, the election/race was also greatly changed and thrown into disarray because of an economic crisis (which the Arabs and Soros may have had their hand in). Do you understand that oil prices were going up because of speculation? Did you know that there was a run on American banks for millions upon millions of dollars just before Congress got involved?

2. Did you ever see the movie or read the book "Catch Me if You Can" or something like that?

It is a real life story of a con artist who was able to pull off incredible feats pretending to be different people because he learned the system and then figured out its weak points and acted so confidently that anyone who had reservations was made to feel like a fool for doubting.

Thus (if memory serves me right) he performed surgery, flew planes, cashed gigantic checks, etc and got away with it.

3. Likewise, Obama was the best chance for the socialist and communist (and perhaps the arabs) to move their agenda along. They cleared the path for him and did whatever cover up was needed. That is why he left no foot prints and has yet to produce a bonafide birth certificate.

Obama could have never gotten a first level pass at the White House so he walked in through the front door.

4. I believe that it is irrational to pay lawyers $2 million dollars to withhold one's birth certificate and create so much doubt if one isn't hiding something big.

5. I believe Obama and her enemies are out to break and remake America into a socialist state and that has been his objective from the beginning.

6. I totally believe what I have written.

I believe the bolded part sums up this thread and any thread like it.

On top of that, I have yet to find evidence of that $2 million number birther's like to throw around. Care to provide?

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...811090361/1001

November 9, 2008 story by the large HI paper on Obama. This story ran concurrently while on Obama's President elect web site he was claiming birth at Queens. He needs to check the paper to see where he was allegedly born?

Thanks for providing further evidence he was born in Hawaii. It's like you're disproving your own points. Awesome!

[coadie]

Twisp.
Is it against the law to release records on Obama?

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

Twisp.
Is it against the law to release records on Obama?

No use posting this in two threads. What records have not been released?

[coadie]

Is it against the law now to release records on Obama?

Same question. Yes or no answer.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by Twisp

No use posting this in two threads. What records have not been released?

Good point. On most other boards, when atheists, darwinists lose an argument big time, they start other thread. Trying to look like they are in control. it is a technique to get attention. It is a lame strategy to distract and re direct a conversation.

Is it against the law now to release records on Obama?

[Twisp]

Originally Posted by coadie

Good point. On most other boards, when atheists, darwinists lose an argument big time, they start other thread. Trying to look like they are in control. it is a technique to get attention. It is a lame strategy to distract and re direct a conversation.

Is it against the law now to release records on Obama?

LOL, you have started three other threads since this one started, all talking about how bad Obama and the democrats are. So you're admitting that you "are losing this argument big time"? Outstanding! The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. Hold my hand, we'll get through this together. lol.

Again, what records have not been released? It would help to know what documents you are talking about. I am sure there are different laws for different situations.