|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
02-13-2009, 09:46 AM
|
 |
My Family!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhoni
lov·er (l  v   r)
n. 1. One who loves another
2. lovers A couple in love with each other.
3. A paramour.
4. One who is fond of or devoted to something: a lover of fine food.
Definitions of the word are many. I am not sure why many of you always look at worst case scenerio.
Blessings, Rhoni
|
Do a little survey today Rhoni - - asks 10 people what they think a lover is.
|
02-13-2009, 09:46 AM
|
 |
Resident PeaceMaker
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson,AL.
Posts: 16,548
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Words can change their meaning so a lover now means something different than it years ago like the word gay meant happy yrs. ago ,but I Sister Rhoni I believe and trust you that you didn't mean nothing wrong by your use of the word.
Years ago makin love could mean dating and holding hands whereas it has sexual overtones now.
__________________
People who are always looking for fault,can find it easily all they have to do,is look into their mirror.
There they can find plenty of fault.
|
02-13-2009, 09:47 AM
|
|
Resident PeaceMaker
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jackson,AL.
Posts: 16,548
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
I'll say this I believe the best here and I think our Sister was only trying to stir the pot.
__________________
People who are always looking for fault,can find it easily all they have to do,is look into their mirror.
There they can find plenty of fault.
|
02-13-2009, 09:50 AM
|
|
delete account
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,086
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson
Words can change their meaning so a lover now means something different than it years ago like the word gay meant happy yrs. ago ,but I Sister Rhoni I believe and trust you that you didn't mean nothing wrong by your use of the word.
Years ago makin love could mean dating and holding hands whereas it has sexual overtones now.
|
At least a person with some sense. Presumed meaning is not a true meaning. The dictionaries have multiple manings. It seems it is always easier to believe the worst in people for some. Thank God for good people like Bro. Scott who things the good.
God Bless You Bro. Scott.
Sincerely, Rhoni
|
02-13-2009, 09:51 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,616
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhoni
I did not use the term to stir up anything maybe you and PO need to get your mind out of the gutter.
Rhonda
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhoni
lov·er (l v r)
n. 1. One who loves another
2. lovers A couple in love with each other.
3. A paramour.
4. One who is fond of or devoted to something: a lover of fine food.
Definitions of the word are many. I am not sure why many of you always look at worst case scenerio.
Blessings, Rhoni
|
Rhonda, it is not a mind in the gutter or negative thinking issue. It is once again an issue that you posted before you stopped to think.
When I read "lover" rather than husband, I could think no other way than what has been stated.
|
02-13-2009, 09:52 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,829
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhoni
I did not use the term to stir up anything maybe you and PO need to get your mind out of the gutter.
Rhonda
|
Oh, please, Rhoni!!!!! When I think of "lover", I think of someone I share my entire mind and body with!!!! First of all, that definition isn't from the "gutter"--that's the normal and WHOLESOME definition, and secondly, that term belongs to the person you're married to. If you're not married, you don't have a lover unless you're in an extramarital, sexual relationship.
Besides, unless you're the ice queen, "cuddling" leads to other things, and as for me...nuzzling my neck is going to get me quite hot and bothered. 
If I were to say, "Hello, AFF, tomorrow I'm going to find a 'lover'", I can assure you most people would define it in the way most have on this thread, and rightly so. That has nothing to do with the "gutter." You're the one taking the word out of normal context, and then acting surprised when people interpret it normally.
__________________
"God, send me anywhere, only go with me. Lay any burden on me, only sustain me. And sever any tie in my heart except the tie that binds my heart to Yours."
--David Livingstone
"To see no being, not God’s or any, but you also go thither,
To see no possession but you may possess it—enjoying all without labor or purchase—
abstracting the feast, yet not abstracting one particle of it;…."
--Walt Whitman, Leaves of Grass, Song of the Open Road
|
02-13-2009, 09:52 AM
|
 |
Not riding the train
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barb
Rhonda, it is not a mind in the gutter or negative thinking issue. It is once again an issue that you posted before you stopped to think.
When I read "lover" rather than husband, I could think no other way than what has been stated.
|
That's the simplicity of it, Barb! Thanks for your post! 
|
02-13-2009, 09:52 AM
|
|
delete account
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,086
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Hutchinson
I'll say this I believe the best here and I think our Sister was only trying to stir the pot.
|
You are talking about Renda & Abbie, right? Looks like they are trying to call me out for the worst instead of believing the best. Looks like I Cor. Chapter 13 should come into play somewhere in this conversation
Blessings, Rhoni
|
02-13-2009, 09:53 AM
|
|
delete account
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,086
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified
Oh, please, Rhoni!!!!! When I think of "lover", I think of someone I share my entire mind and body with!!!! First of all, that definition isn't from the "gutter"--that's the normal and WHOLESOME definition, and secondly, that term belongs to the person you're married to. If you're not married, you don't have a lover unless you're in an extramarital, sexual relationship.
Besides, unless you're the ice queen, "cuddling" leads to other things, and as for me...nuzzling my neck is going to get me quite hot and bothered.
If I were to say, "Hello, AFF, tomorrow I'm going to find a 'lover'", I can assure you most people would define it in the way most have on this thread, and rightly so. That has nothing to do with the "gutter." You're the one taking the word out of normal context, and then acting surprised when people interpret it normally. |
Last I checked you were married, therefore your definition would carry a different connotation.
Blessings, Rhoni
|
02-13-2009, 09:53 AM
|
|
Not riding the train
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
|
|
|
Re: Living Arrangements
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified
Oh, please, Rhoni!!!!! When I think of "lover", I think of someone I share my entire mind and body with!!!! First of all, that definition isn't from the "gutter"--that's the normal and WHOLESOME definition, and secondly, that term belongs to the person you're married to. If you're not married, you don't have a lover unless you're in an extramarital, sexual relationship.
Besides, unless you're the ice queen, "cuddling" leads to other things, and as for me...nuzzling my neck is going to get me quite hot and bothered.
If I were to say, "Hello, AFF, tomorrow I'm going to find a 'lover'", I can assure you most people would define it in the way most have on this thread, and rightly so. That has nothing to do with the "gutter." You're the one taking the word out of normal context, and then acting surprised when people interpret it normally. |
Acting surprised is not the word. Caught is the word! 
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
