Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
If you ever think that you will get a historical account that is 100% objective and void of any bias .. that is INSANITY.
|
That's why there are so many views of certain points in History. Take the Civil War, there is lots of information concerning that part of time, but one must take in all the information to come up with a balance view. Agenda builders don't want a balanced view because they hold an agenda, and if their agenda gets defeated they would have to recant their flawed position.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
The Marxian view of history teaches us that history is written by the "winners" .... For years ... an important and untold story had been sanitized within the org ... that story was finally told ...
|
My point exactly Brother Daniel, so you have Thomas Fudge getting shown the door at Hazelwood and having an attitude that shows as he writes his book. It was obvious and that was sad to see. So what you have left is Thomas Fudge's bias view of our history.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
There are men alive today that can testify to it ... Even conservative men like Epley have verified the veracity of many of the details provide in this book ....
|
A few men, have you talked to all these men other than Elder Epley?
It’s called research Brother Daniel. I'm not going to bank on a few people on an Internet forum to compile history. Yes some things may be close or even correct. Still the good students makes real sure he covers his bases by finding the BEST primary sources. One witness does not give you all the facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea
History is the account of past events through the eyes of the historian ... for years we got only one perspective ...
|
When studying the Roman Empire you have quite a few different sources to choose from, and even now we are gathering new information. Our view of history is ever changing as new finds and new research is being given.
In Jesus name
Brother Benincasa
www.OnTimeJournal.com