Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The D.A.'s Office
Facebook

Notices

The D.A.'s Office The views expressed in this forum are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of AFF or the Admin of AFF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:20 AM
J-Roc's Avatar
J-Roc J-Roc is offline
His word burns in my heart like a fire...Fire Fall Down


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Those who stress Acts 2:38 and folks obey it then I rejoice. Folks who minimize it and honestly seem as they despise it then I fight them boldly. That is the difference your tact is not the same as those who somewhat claim to be as you are in case you have not noticed. The distain reeks from them as they are handling dirty socks when they speaking of the Name above every name in baptism.


Dan, willya find him a mirror please...
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:21 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster View Post
I respect you, but I don't believe this is true.

Felicity, can't you - just for one moment - begin to look around at the other posters who are identifying with the so called PCI view? They do not hold the same level of love you claim to have for the Acts 2:38 message. In fact, they quite despise it.

I have watched this junk for several days now, and for the most part I have remained remarkably civil and tolerant. But this is whacked! Don't tell me you love the message, and then slam it, and everyone who preaches it, as often as possible.
I can read and think and what you are saying is openly evident!
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:21 AM
Nahum Nahum is offline
Registered User


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felicity View Post
Where have you gotten this impression?

We have always and still preach baptism in Jesus name STRONG!!! Every preacher I know personally who has left the UPC still believes in the necessity of baptism and baptizes in Jesus name only. And that includes PCIers if that's the preferred label.
You may, but mark my word, when a think becomes unnecessary, it is only a matter of time before it is tossed out in the garbage. That is what is happening here. Maybe not by you, but many others have this attitude.

It is no longer necessary to them. It is legalistic.

In time they will cast off the bands of this "legalism".
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:21 AM
Felicity's Avatar
Felicity Felicity is offline
Step By Step - Day By Day


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Christ Church-Bethel-Vanhoose church-Fender's church-nad many others do not emphasize baptism in Jesus Name.
I don't know those people. I said the people I know. Of course there are some who go gradually into apostasy. That has nothing to do with me.

I don't like the broad-brushing that goes on here so it's necessary to speak up and insert reality where it seems to have disappeared.
__________________
Smiles & Blessings....
~Felicity Welsh~

(surname courtesy of Jim Yohe)
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:22 AM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster View Post
You may, but mark my word, when a think becomes unnecessary, it is only a matter of time before it is tossed out in the garbage. That is what is happening here. Maybe not by you, but many others have this attitude.

It is no longer necessary to them. It is legalistic.

In time they will cast off the bands of this "legalism".
anti-TV argument just repackaged ... C'mon PP!!!
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:23 AM
Steve Epley's Avatar
Steve Epley Steve Epley is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Epley View Post
Christ Church-Bethel-Vanhoose church-Fender's church-nad many others do not emphasize baptism in Jesus Name.
Felicity I name some here and there are many others?
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:23 AM
J-Roc's Avatar
J-Roc J-Roc is offline
His word burns in my heart like a fire...Fire Fall Down


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster View Post
I respect you, but I don't believe this is true.

Felicity, can't you - just for one moment - begin to look around at the other posters who are identifying with the so called PCI view? They do not hold the same level of love you claim to have for the Acts 2:38 message. In fact, they quite despise it.

I have watched this junk for several days now, and for the most part I have remained remarkably civil and tolerant. But this is whacked! Don't tell me you love the message, and then slam it, and everyone who preaches it, as often as possible.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
The Seer.



Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:23 AM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Elder Epley ... would you please comment on Seagraves comments on the Tabernacle and the laver.
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:24 AM
Felicity's Avatar
Felicity Felicity is offline
Step By Step - Day By Day


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster View Post
You may, but mark my word, when a think becomes unnecessary, it is only a matter of time before it is tossed out in the garbage. That is what is happening here. Maybe not by you, but many others have this attitude.

It is no longer necessary to them. It is legalistic.

In time they will cast off the bands of this "legalism".
PP........

Honestly, I appreciate you but I'm not reading where anyone is saying anything is necessarily unnecessary. And if they ARE making that kind of remark .... necessary for what? Unnecessary for what?

Let's keep a clear head here.
__________________
Smiles & Blessings....
~Felicity Welsh~

(surname courtesy of Jim Yohe)
Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:24 AM
Nahum Nahum is offline
Registered User


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
anti-TV argument just repackaged ... C'mon PP!!!

Daniel, you are rapidly becoming incoherent.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.