here is my problem. which part of the UPCI are you talking about disagreeing with? the 50.1% that dont want to have anything to do with Television or the 49.9% that want to use TV as a too for evangelism and outreach?
See here is the problem. guys like PP and I, probably dont agree with the California Ultra Con on the reasons to pour milk over cereal, but we are almost in lock step with the Louisiana Liberal....both are UPCI...Which side do we have to agree with to stay? With great respect, it aint quite so easy Brother Steadfast...
Brother.. California is a wild land where men make their own laws... so using the Western District as a fellowship is somewhat a misnomer...
For example without meaning any offence Christ Church is a perfect example no one of the PCI group of yesteryear would be able to identify with this church though the pastor has PCI roots directly to Gurley. The Gurley type preaching would not be at home in this church. Pianoman said his son-in-law had visited a year and had not hear about the HGB. The Oneness and baptism are taught in private classes not mentioned from the pulpit. Thus this congregation who has roots firmly to connect to the PCI actually has very little in common with the message or method practiced by the PCI forefathers.
So let me get this straight: because a church has decided it is better to love folks into relationship (give them milk) rather than trying to cram a t-bone down an infants throat, you believe they have nothing in common with believers of the past?
How about wise as serpents and harmless as doves?
__________________ For it is written, "As I live, says the Lord every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall give praise to God. (Romans 14:11- NASB)
Linear Mode
