Selling Out to Cash In.... Ex-Apostolics... - Page 21

SDG · #**201** 05-25-2007, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revrandy

If by Tradition you mean the Apostles Doctrine and the Word of God I stand guilty before you all!!

2O TH CENTURY PAJC OP TRADITION ....

Nahum · #**202** 05-25-2007, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Oh it didn't stop at 38 ..... I knew that ....

What other commands were important enough to be recorded? zilch, zero, nada, none! The main body of his response was encapsulated in 38. It was enough. It was clear. The proper response to the gospel is Acts 2:38.

revrandy · #**203** 05-25-2007, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Wrong the the present state of affairs ... the AS .....is about the New Birth first .... Holiness and TV second .. if you acan't see you been SOLD A BAG OF GOODS ... then it's on you ....

Dan..

Do you believe TBN promotes the Gospel of Jesus Christ and Who he is?

SDG · #**204** 05-25-2007, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

What other commands were important enough to be recorded? zilch, zero, nada, none! The main body of his response was encapsulated in 38. It was enough. It was clear. The proper response to the gospel is Acts 2:38.

Save yourselves from this untoward generation ... seems like a command to me ..... Heard brother Huntley preach a powerful message ... on this other command after verse 38 .... which BTW isn't the end of the message.

Nahum · #**205** 05-25-2007, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Wrong the the present state of affairs ... the AS .....is about the New Birth first .... Holiness and TV second .. if you can't see you been SOLD A BAG OF GOODS ... then it's on you ....

Well if the AS was about the New Birth, I am horribly sorry I have ever slammed it. I have no problem signing a document affirming my belief in the only saving message to the world. However, I don't believe that is what it was about at all. It was about standards.

SDG · #**206** 05-25-2007, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revrandy

Dan..

Do you believe TBN promotes the Gospel of Jesus Christ and Who he is?

If The Gospel of Jesus Christ is his death and resurrection ... then yes ... if it is WHAT SOME PAJCERS believe then no they don't teach that ACTS 2:38 IS THE GOSPEL ...

I assume that they teach he is the Son of God and that he is God. Do they use the semantics you and I do ... I don't know ... don't watch it.

revrandy · #**207** 05-25-2007, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

If The Gospel of Jesus Christ is his death and resurrection ... then yes ... if it is WHAT SOME PAJCERS believe then no they don't teach that ACTS 2:38 IS THE GOSPEL ...

I assume that they teach he is the Son of God and that he is God. Do they use the semantics you and I do ... I don't know ... don't watch it.

Then why this big arguement to defend Ex-Apostolics promoting the Trinity on TBN by being there???

SDG · #**208** 05-25-2007, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

Well if the AS was about the New Birth, I am horribly sorry I have ever slammed it. I have no problem signing a document affirming my belief in the only saving message to the world. However, I don't believe that is what it was about at all. It was about standards.

Even CS ....who knew Westberg ... Brother Strange who was there ... and anyone in the know ... will tell you, PP, that the AS was about first about the NB ... and holiness standards ....for good measure ...

the UC's wanted to sanitize the movement of divergent thought ....

With the PCIers removed ... the last battle regarding the AS is standards like TV .... You don't even SEE IT ... PP.