If never trumpers voted for trump...

[Scott Pitta]

DT is the most dangerous candidate to seriously run. Blowhard is but a tiny part of the profound risk he brings to the White House.

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

DT is the most dangerous candidate to seriously run. Blowhard is but a tiny part of the profound risk he brings to the White House.

Based on what? Campaign rhetoric? We have endured eight years of a president who was groomed as a child to think of our country in the worst light possible. His wife was never proud of her country in her entire adult life until her husband was elected. President Obama and his associates represented a segment of America that sought to fundamentally alter our nation and its underpinnings. I don't believe that was accomplished entirely, but a lot about America will never be the same after these eight years. $20 trillion of debt alone will probably guarantee that one day we will be financially insolvent.

Like others, "the sky is falling" is pure guess work. Trump has a track record of success and job creation. Obviously his track record isn't without blemish, but at least we have someone who has been an executive before and isn't an ideologue. I'm optimistic.

[Jason B]

Originally Posted by jfrog

Would he have won the popular vote?

Many did when it came down to it

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by jfrog

Would he have won the popular vote?

Take away the dead voters, illegal voters, repeat voters, and Diebold flip-voters, and it would be reasonable to assume Trump won by a landslide not seen in any of our lifetimes.

The actual election, though, hasn't even happened yet.

So we will see.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Scott Pitta

DT is the most dangerous candidate to seriously run. Blowhard is but a tiny part of the profound risk he brings to the White House.

Please demonstrate how he is more dangerous than Obama, Clinton, or her husband, or FDR for that matter.

[Jito463]

Originally Posted by n david

No. My issues weren't with his temperament as much as they were with the fact that he has no track record of being a consistent conservative.

[deacon blues]

Originally Posted by n david

No. My issues weren't with his temperament as much as they were with the fact that he has no track record of being a consistent conservative.

I had concerns about conservative issues with DT. But Hillary "trumped" all of those concerns bc I didn't have a shred of doubt what she would do as president. Obviously looking at what DT has done thus far, nominating people with strong conservative credentials, shows the wisdom of supporting Trump for president. Do you think for a minute HRC would be nominating conservatives? With Hillary zero chance of conservatives in the Cabinet. With Trump there was a chance. That thinking is now being validated.

[n david]

Rep Justin Amash on AG Sessions: """He supports indefinite detention of Americans w/o charge or trial, mass surveillance of law-abiding Americans, civil asset forfeiture, etc."""

So much for civil liberties.

[FlamingZword]

Originally Posted by n david

Rep Justin Amash on AG Sessions: """He supports indefinite detention of Americans w/o charge or trial, mass surveillance of law-abiding Americans, civil asset forfeiture, etc."""

So much for civil liberties.

You are just parroting false accusations.

[n david]

Originally Posted by FlamingZword

You are just parroting false accusations.

No, I'm not. Look at his record. Good grief!

Also, you can argue with me and, like 0 and DB, claim I'm an idiot, but you can't argue with Rep Amash. Well, you could, but you would lose. Bigly.