BLM activists beat up teen

[Jito463]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

BLM had nothing to do with this crime. Nothing at all! It is a clear lie and part of a pattern of right-wing media outlets attributing senseless acts of violence to BLM.

So the BLM movement has never said anything that would incite violence, like the aforementioned quote I posted?

And that's just the tip of the iceberg. There's many more instances caught on camera.

[Jito463]

Originally Posted by Esaias

If some white kids with shaved heads, suspenders, and Doc Martins were wearing shirts that said 'White power', and some black kid came in wearing a shirt that said 'All people power', and the white kids beat up and curb stomped the black kid, would you say that the Skinhead movement had nothing to do with it?

Suppose the white kids had shirts with the old cross and blood drop and '33/5', underneath which read 'White Krusader Knights of the Kross', would you say the Klan had nothing to do with it? And suppose the kids weren't actually members of any local Klavern, just a bunch of wanna-be's. Still you would ardently demand that people recognise the Klan had nothing to do with this?

Really?

[Jermyn Davidson]

The article indicates the attackers attended the same high school as the victim, though they had already graduated at the time of the attack.

As for linking these guys directly to BLM-- which would be DISHONEST, I bring up one name: Dylan Roof.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

The article indicates the attackers attended the same high school as the victim, though they had already graduated at the time of the attack.

As for linking these guys directly to BLM-- which would be DISHONEST, I bring up one name: Dylan Roof.

Why won't you answer my question?

And why bring up a democrat nutcase?

[shazeep]

do you guys ever sleep?

ya gotta believe BLM has been corrupted--just like the Black Panthers were--and was not founded on a lie, but drew militants to it, which a movement like that would do pretty quickly anyway even without the CIA or whoever's help. I'm surprised at the video, that doesn't rep the BLM as i understand it. Surely BLM means...something different, to different people now, like...every other term you use.

Regardless of what the term means to you, see how it is turned into "news" to divide you up. BLM has has brought about some great changes, that were long overdue imo.

There is no banner but Christ, and there are plenty of counterfeits there too. Be a joiner if you like, but recognize when you join that the battle you think you are fighting is not the real battle.

[Jito463]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

As for linking these guys directly to BLM-- which would be DISHONEST, I bring up one name: Dylan Roof.

JD, what you have to understand about BLM, is that it's not an 'organic movement' as they would have you believe. It's funded by George Soros, the Nazi collaborator. Who, by the way, is the same one that funded Obama's campaigns in '08 and '12. He also funds numerous Democrat "think tanks" (an oxymoron if I ever heard one), whose primary responsibility is helping Democrats get elected.

The whole movement is a farce and based on a lie (the "hands up, don't shoot" that aegsm76 has pointed out already).

[shazeep]

hey, if it gets us body cameras on cops, and turns the tide in cases where the cameras "malfunctioned," then i guess Soros can even do some good maybe.

[aegsm76]

JD - here is another protest by BLM activists.
The motto of this one was:
"Blue Lives don't matter".
Make sure and watch the video!

link
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/1...es-dont-matter

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Esaias

If some white kids with shaved heads, suspenders, and Doc Martins were wearing shirts that said 'White power', and some black kid came in wearing a shirt that said 'All people power', and the white kids beat up and curb stomped the black kid, would you say that the Skinhead movement had nothing to do with it?

The problem with your question is that there are numerous skinhead organizations. Which one would you want me to blame? Or rather, which organization should be put on trial for the actions of violence? Or do you think that the perpetrators themselves would be held accountable for their actions-- whether inspired by skin head organization A, B, or C?

Originally Posted by Esaias

Suppose the white kids had shirts with the old cross and blood drop and '33/5', underneath which read 'White Krusader Knights of the Kross', would you say the Klan had nothing to do with it?

If they are wearing clothing that ties them directly to the KKK, then I would imagine the KKK would have something to do with it-- but you would still need evidence.

Originally Posted by Esaias

And suppose the kids weren't actually members of any local Klavern, just a bunch of wanna-be's. Still you would ardently demand that people recognise the Klan had nothing to do with this?

No. There are hate crimes committed today that have nothing to do with the KKK. James Byrd Jr???

Originally Posted by Esaias

Really?

For real.
Listen, not every crime is a hate crime. Not every hate crime is directly connected to a hateful organization.

While the KKK and most Skin Head organizations are hateful BY CHARTER, BLM is not and this is WHY BLM is not a hate group.

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by Jito463

JD, what you have to understand about BLM, is that it's not an 'organic movement' as they would have you believe. It's funded by George Soros, the Nazi collaborator. Who, by the way, is the same one that funded Obama's campaigns in '08 and '12. He also funds numerous Democrat "think tanks" (an oxymoron if I ever heard one), whose primary responsibility is helping Democrats get elected.

The whole movement is a farce and based on a lie (the "hands up, don't shoot" that aegsm76 has pointed out already).

WRONG.
Black Lives Matter started after the acquittal of George Zimmerman.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter