Wikileaks announcement at 2AM CST

[n david]

Originally Posted by jfrog

N David, we understand that nothing the man does will be viewed as good by you.

And I understand that nothing Trump does or says will be questioned or criticized by his supporters.

Trump was right on one thing, he could stand in times square and shoot people and not lose any supporters. It's likely his supporters would defend and applaud.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Yet, they gladly published the contents of a hacked computer relating to Trump's taxes.

That's not how the NYTimes got his tax info.

""""The pages were mailed last month to Susanne Craig, a reporter at The Times who has written about Mr. Trump’s finances."""

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

That's not how the NYTimes got his tax info.

""""The pages were mailed last month to Susanne Craig, a reporter at The Times who has written about Mr. Trump’s finances."""

Yes, you are correct. However, they were obtained and the Times is still operating under a double standard.

And Trump "took advantage of tax laws". So? Did he break the law?

[shazeep]

oh, poof on him, how bout the OPs that placed hands on him to "protect" him? did they break any laws? Would you be proud to have one of them baptize you?

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Yes, you are correct. However, they were obtained and the Times is still operating under a double standard.

And Trump "took advantage of tax laws". So? Did he break the law?

No, he didn't break the law. But neither do the low/middle class which many conservatives like to complain about not paying taxes.

Of course, he now wants to fix the loopholes which helped him avoid paying taxes.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Yes, you are correct. However, they were obtained and the Times is still operating under a double standard.

And Trump "took advantage of tax laws". So? Did he break the law?

How is the Times operating under a double standard?

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by n david

And I understand that nothing Trump does or says will be questioned or criticized by his supporters.

Trump was right on one thing, he could stand in times square and shoot people and not lose any supporters. It's likely his supporters would defend and applaud.

Is that deflection? Isn't that a double standard!

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by n david

No, he didn't break the law. But neither do the low/middle class which many conservatives like to complain about not paying taxes.

Of course, he now wants to fix the loopholes which helped him avoid paying taxes.

I meant to say that the Times obtained them illegally. In my haste I skipped the word. But the fact remains, the Times has a double standard. And the only taxes conservatives complain about not being paid are those that are actually owed. Trump owes no taxes.

In spite of financial loss, he rebounded time and again to amass a fortune and create allot of jobs in the process. Don't act as if this is all news to you. Trump was very open about his losses in his book. This is not even news.

[shazeep]

some announcement tho, huh?

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by n david

Funny how Trumpsters are defending Trump not paying taxes, but will complain about low/middle class not paying any either.

Tired of all this deflection whenever something negative about Trump comes out. "But Hillary...." If your standard is Hillary, there's a problem.

#NeverTrump