Nationalist Leader Endsorses Trump...

[Jermyn Davidson]

Originally Posted by n david

JD's back.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson

Words matter. Language matters. The title of this thread should be "White Nationalist..."

Trump has a history with WHITE nationalists.

When people try to disguise in flowery language just who are some of Trump's loudest supporters, gently but firmly correct them.

Trump is not just a nationalist.

He's hardly even patriotic and the word "brave" would not be a fitting description for him either.

Honesty matters.

Trump courts bigots.

Others in the GOP have as well, but not to the extent that Trump has courted them.

A GOP Trump nomination betrays true conservative politics AND all notions of racial equality, even if the social-buffoon Dr. is his running mate.

Just because he has blacks supporting him doesn't really mean anything, especially in light of American history.

Lots of blacks supported Jim Jones too.

But of course when you are told that communists endorse Obama, you cry foul.

Trump has no "history" with white nationalists. That is absurd. Certainly white nationalists are going to cheer for a candidate who is opposed to mass illegal immigration from 3rd world countries, even though Trump's reasons for opposing illegals are different from those of white nationalists. Yet several prominent Afro-Americans are also opposed to illegal immigration. Are they bigots?

Obama, on the other hand, does have a history with communists and embraced their beliefs.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Oh my gosh, Esaias. Your posts are so over the top ridiculous, you have lost ALL credibility in this political discussion. Just shut up. Good freaking grief!!

Cruz is irrelevant now, and so are his Kool Aid drinkers. Moving on now to more important things.

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Cruz is irrelevant now, and so are his Kool Aid drinkers. Moving on now to more important things.

These GOP conventions that keep awarding delegates to Cruz, in spite of the fact that Trump won their handily, are proof that the party itself is the enemy of the people.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Jason Badejo

Agreed. He lost political cred a long time ago.

If "political cred" means believing campaign PR talking points instead of known facts, then I don't need or want any "cred".

When Cruz ran for Senate I thought he was a great, Tea Party conservative.

Then I saw what he actually did, and I woke up.

Eyes wide open, not shutting ever again. All your politicians are liars and hypocrites, bought and paid for, and as long as "we the people" keep looking to politicians and parties to fix the nation God will continue tightening the screws. Enjoy.

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Originalist

These GOP conventions that keep awarding delegates to Cruz, in spite of the fact that Trump won their handily, are proof that the party itself is the enemy of the people.

Exactly, which is why I am no longer a Republitard and will NEVER E.V.E.R. vote for a Republitard E.V.E.R. again. Period. They can play kumbaya with the democruds all they want, both of them are fast approaching irrelevancy.

And good riddance.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Cruz is irrelevant now, and so are his Kool Aid drinkers. Moving on now to more important things.

IE, now that you've been called out for lying, either blatantly or ignorantly multiple times in one post, you don't want to address the lies. Instead you want to forget about it, because..."Cruz is irrelevant" according to you.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Originalist

These GOP conventions that keep awarding delegates to Cruz, in spite of the fact that Trump won their handily, are proof that the party itself is the enemy of the people.

Stop whining. These delegates still have to vote for Trump for as many rounds as the state rules say they do.

Don't be mad that more Cruz delegates were voted in than Trump delegates.

You should focus your anger and frustration on Trump who didn't know the rules going in, and didn't put any resources on the ground to build relationships and win the grassroots.

If this goes contested convention and Trump loses, he has only himself to blame.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Esaias

If "political cred" means believing campaign PR talking points instead of known facts, then I don't need or want any "cred".

Except you don't have facts, you have lies and allegations.

NY Times isn't campaign PR. FoxNews Town Hall with Megyn Kelly isn't campaign PR.

You make up trash about Cruz with no source or proof. Then when someone confronts you about it, proving you wrong, you claim it's campaign PR and say you're moving on.

[n david]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Then I saw what he actually did, and I woke up.

Here we go again....

What did Cruz "actually" do, according to you?