Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
There were two phone calls that brought the police to the area where this guy was-- one of the phone calls had to do with a disturbance FROM INSIDE the young mans house.
The police forced his way into the young man's house because he thought he heard a "disturbance" from INSIDE the young man's house.
The scuffle happened INSIDE the young man's house.
The police killed the young man while he was INSIDE his own house.
I'd like to know if there was anyone else inside the young man's house from the get go.
I'd like to know what was the NATURE of the disturbance from INSIDE the young man's house that made the police decide to FORCE his way INSIDE THE YOUNG MAN'S HOUSE.
My gut feeling is that there really isn't a valid justification for this shooting but there is an investigation pending and would need to see the results. Too many unanswered questions.
The police killed this young man inside his home. Someone else brought up search and seizure laws. This does seem fishy.
|
First call was about someone jumping into traffic. Second call alleged battery.
The officer who responded claimed he heard a disturbance inside the home. Legally, he was then able to force his way into the home.
I've read several headlines and stories of officers forcing their way into a home (legally - due to "hearing a disturbance") which resulted in someone in the home being shot or killed by the officer. It's sad, because a few stories stated the person killed or arrested didn't even know it was a cop entering the home, they were in another part of the house and just responded to the noise of a forced entry.
The officer claims the kid assaulted him and apparently the officer shot him in self defense. I would give the officer the benefit of the doubt as to why he entered the home. Personally, that's the last thing I would want to do as a cop. He's blind to who or what he'll find inside. Since he entered the home, I would bet he had a good reason to do so.
A lot unanswered questions. I don't know that the investigation will even answer them all.
Did the officer have backup, or was he alone?
Did the kid answer the door, or was he in a back room and didn't see the officer but responded to someone forcefully entering his home?
What type of "disturbance" did the officer hear which made him decide to force his way inside?
Did the kid use a weapon, or grab for the officer's weapon?
If alone, could the officer have waited for backup, or was the type of disturbance he heard life-threatening?