PO's Sheriff Arpaio In Trouble

[canam]

Originally Posted by BeenThinkin

Is DM wrong again?

BT

[Dedicated Mind]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Feds shut down criminal investigation of Arpaio; no charges to be filed
Aug. 31, 2012 05:18 PM

The U.S. Attorney's Office has closed its long-running abuse-of-power investigation into Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio -- without any charges to be filed.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/politi...r-breakingnews

Originally Posted by canam

bingo told ya so, dm is depressed now !!

Originally Posted by BeenThinkin

Is DM wrong again?

BT

this lawsuit quoted by PO is the justice department lawsuit, not the same as the lawsuit by 2 reporters suing Arpaio for 15 million dollars that I quoted. Burn baby burn. a little reading would help.

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind

this lawsuit quoted by PO is the justice department lawsuit, not the same as the lawsuit by 2 reporters suing Arpaio for 15 million dollars that I quoted. Burn baby burn. a little reading would help.

DM,
It's not a ruling on the final case - so it's still an allegation.

"As we discuss the “facts” of this case, we remind the parties and other
interested persons that, because we remand this case to the district court, both sides will have an opportunity to prove or contest the “facts” alleged in the complaint and set forth in this opinion."

[Sam]

Originally Posted by BeenThinkin

Is DM wrong again?

BT

not again but still

[Dedicated Mind]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

DM,
It's not a ruling on the final case - so it's still an allegation.

"As we discuss the “facts” of this case, we remind the parties and other
interested persons that, because we remand this case to the district court, both sides will have an opportunity to prove or contest the “facts” alleged in the complaint and set forth in this opinion."

my point is that the reporter's lawsuit is going forward. true or false?

[Pressing-On]

Originally Posted by Dedicated Mind

my point is that the reporter's lawsuit is going forward. true or false?

Yes, of course you are correct. It's just that without a final ruling, it doesn't really mean anything at this point. And now, today, the Feds back away from him. I don't see the case getting anywhere.

[canam]

frivolous lawsuit

[deafdriscoll]

I read the report before saying what i thought. If the man voilated someones rights he needs to be removed from office.