Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
Your boy Obama sure has a strange way of promoting the idea of less abortions. Wasn't that him? He wants less abortions but he makes providing abortion as a form of birth control one of his platforms.
Vote Obama he is a liar - kinda has a ring to it.
|
Obama just wants it to be legal. Yes, that means some women might abuse that choice. But what that means to me personally as a voter is that if my wife faces a crisis pregnancy where her health or life is in danger, that painful choice would be ours to make. Not the governments.
If anyone tells you that banning abortion or even putting restrictions on abortions will have a significant impact on abortion’s occurrence they’re stupid. Muslim countries in the Middle East and Catholic Countries in South America have had some of the strongest laws against abortion and their abortion rates were still sky high (based on maternal morbidity so actual numbers are even higher). In Westernized countries abortion’s legality has had virtually no impact on abortion rates. However, there are exceptions where social policies aimed at reducing abortion have been implemented. Countries such as Belgium have passed social policies that actually help women facing crisis pregnancies thereby helping and encouraging them to choose life. In addition a strong agenda teaching the benefits of both abstinence and the use of contraceptives for those who are active have also aided in the decrease of abortion’s occurrence. Today Belgium has the LOWEST abortion rate on earth….and please note that abortion is still legal in Belgium.
Banning abortion just sweeps it under the rug without any of us having to put money into solid programs and initiatives that will save lives. Most political conservatives oppose programs that would actually save lives because after all is said and done all they care about is their money.