Apostolic Litumus Test: Do you affirm - Yes or no?

[SDG]

Originally Posted by chaotic_resolve

JT, what other signs or evidence is there of the infilling of the HG?

Fruit of the Spirit ... Galatians 5.

[SDG]

Today we've had 3 posters profess that this forum is not Apostolic or at least most of you are not ...

Of course many groups, including Catholics, define and use the term differently...

However as a group ... a subculture ... we collectively have defined it as found in our rules ...

This will of course prove nothing to them ... other than their definitions are what really matters.

At least under this definition ... this forum will remain to be Apostolic as demonstrated by this sample poll... I say so without hesitation.

Ironically, one of the author's of this affirmation maintains this is not an Apostolic forum

[SDG]

There you have it.... Pastor Poster is not Apostolic ... proof positive in poll results.

[Nahum]

I am Pentecostal.

More Pentecostal than the lot of you!

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

From our rules:

Apostolic is defined on AFF as:

Those that believe that every sinner must repent of their sins.
That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith
with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.

Those that believe that every sinner must repent of their sins.
That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith
with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.

Daniel, you voted for this?

How could you?

You don't think it matters how someone is baptized, or even IF they are baptized.

That's why these polls are stupid.

[Nahum]

I could not vote yes.

This doctrine is too watered down.

[Nahum]

Tullock voted yes!

HAHAHAHA!!!!

[SDG]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

I could not vote yes.

This doctrine is too watered down.

Steve Epley didnt have a problem w/ it...

Apparently you don't believe in these things as evident by your answer ...

I would answer the baptism myth but everyone here knows where I stand on it ... except for a handful w/ extremist viess.

[chaotic_resolve]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Fruit of the Spirit ... Galatians 5.

That's not a sign of the initial infilling of the HG ... that just tells what a person living for God should exemplify.

"...love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance..."

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

Steve Epley didnt have a problem w/ it...

Apparently you don't believe in these things as evident by your answer ...

I would answer the baptism myth but everyone here knows where I stand on it ... except for a handful w/ extremist viess.

I am disappointed in the Elder.

Perhaps he's on the slippery slope?

It's not a myth Daniel.

You don't think baptism is necessary.

Dude, it's cool to admit it. You've admitted it several times on this forum.

I just don't understand how you could vote yes on this poll, considering.