|
Tab Menu 1
| WPF News Discussion of the WWPF meetings in Tulsa and related sidetracks. |
 |
|
03-04-2008, 12:42 PM
|
 |
^ = A_Post-Modern
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,654
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
Why is the information here so so secret? Who is the pastor, the bishop and where was this supposed to be? I've been out of the UPC so I long I no longer know all the code and the "Who's Who". Is AA Allen Alda? I didn't realize the WD was THAT liberal. 
__________________
"Most human beings are not able to stand the message of the shaking of foundations. They reject and attack the prophetic minds, not because they really disagree with them, but because they sense the truth of their words and cannot receive it." Paul Tillich
|
03-04-2008, 02:06 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,408
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_PoMo
Why is the information here so so secret? Who is the pastor, the bishop and where was this supposed to be? I've been out of the UPC so I long I no longer know all the code and the "Who's Who". Is AA Allen Alda? I didn't realize the WD was THAT liberal. |
Probably for the same reasons you don't want to list details about yourself, your pastor, and your former pastor.... 
This is all sensitive stuff, and people are walking on eggshells right now. Not fun. 
|
03-06-2008, 04:23 PM
|
 |
Go Dodgers!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45,791
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
Quote:
Originally Posted by dizzyde
Raven, I agree with your assessments. This whole situation makes me want to bang my head up against the wall. This is a snapshot of the state of the WD, I am seriously starting to doubt whether we will have a district left when the dust finally settles. Such a monumental waste.
|
NO it is not. This is not a snapshot since the WD is going to be split into two new Distincts. The South already has it's board selected.
And just who are we supposed to believe anyways? There is always so much rumor going around I never know what to believe...
In fact I hear tell the pastor in question as a propeller that springs out of his butt and flies him around the church while he is preaching...it's amazing really 
__________________
Let it be understood that Apostolic Friends Forum is an Apostolic Forum.
Apostolic is defined on AFF as:
- There is One God. This one God reveals Himself distinctly as Father, Son and Holy Ghost.
- The Son is God himself in a human form or "God manifested in the flesh" (1Tim 3:16)
- Every sinner must repent of their sins.
- That Jesus name baptism is the only biblical mode of water baptism.
- That the Holy Ghost is for today and is received by faith with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.
- The saint will go on to strive to live a holy life, pleasing to God.
|
03-06-2008, 04:27 PM
|
|
^ = A_Post-Modern
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,654
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
NO it is not. This is not a snapshot since the WD is going to be split into two new Distincts. The South already has it's board selected.
And just who are we supposed to believe anyways? There is always so much rumor going around I never know what to believe...
In fact I hear tell the pastor in question as a propeller that springs out of his butt and flies him around the church while he is preaching...it's amazing really |
Ouch. That sounds painful.
Diz, you show me your name and I'll show you mine.
__________________
"Most human beings are not able to stand the message of the shaking of foundations. They reject and attack the prophetic minds, not because they really disagree with them, but because they sense the truth of their words and cannot receive it." Paul Tillich
|
03-06-2008, 04:55 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,408
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
NO it is not. This is not a snapshot since the WD is going to be split into two new Distincts. The South already has it's board selected.
And just who are we supposed to believe anyways? There is always so much rumor going around I never know what to believe...
In fact I hear tell the pastor in question as a propeller that springs out of his butt and flies him around the church while he is preaching...it's amazing really |
Number 1. When I said Western District, I meant Western District. This conversation has nothing to do with the Southern District. And respectfully, I do know what I am talking about and it isn't rumor. Since it isn't your district that is being discussed, you don't have to worry about it.
Number 2. Since I don't have any idea if you have any idea what situation it is that I was referring to, I guess it is your choice to have an opinion about whether or not I am overreacting. I and many others that know about this situation are very upset about it. I guess that is my prerogative to feel how I want about any given situation.
P.S. The district isn't splitting, it is split. Done. We are sharing events this year for convenience sake only.
|
03-06-2008, 04:59 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,408
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_PoMo
Ouch. That sounds painful.
Diz, you show me your name and I'll show you mine. |
Oh, it sounds like you were probably gone a long time before my name (surname) meant much to anybody in this district. I have a very close relative who has been involved in district leadership for a while now, but is currently a free man.
But I'd LOVE to hear yours!!!!! 
|
03-06-2008, 05:05 PM
|
|
^ = A_Post-Modern
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,654
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
My name is, my name is, my name is...Slim Shady.
Actually, all kidding aside, my name is Charles Mahaney. Now pass me them chicken wings, hallelujah, halleluhah.
__________________
"Most human beings are not able to stand the message of the shaking of foundations. They reject and attack the prophetic minds, not because they really disagree with them, but because they sense the truth of their words and cannot receive it." Paul Tillich
|
03-06-2008, 05:15 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,408
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_PoMo
My name is, my name is, my name is...Slim Shady.
Actually, all kidding aside, my name is Charles Mahaney. Now pass me them chicken wings, hallelujah, halleluhah.
|
WOW, bro., I'm kinda spooked out, are you posting from the other side??? 
|
03-06-2008, 07:54 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Proud American
Posts: 1,153
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
Quote:
Originally Posted by dizzyde
WOW, bro., I'm kinda spooked out, are you posting from the other side??? |
LOL Now that thar is funny!
__________________
 George - as in curious
|
03-06-2008, 07:55 PM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Proud American
Posts: 1,153
|
|
|
Re: Western District Conference Controversy
I had a friend tell me the western district conference was supposed to be in San Jose.
__________________
George - as in curious
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 AM.
| |
Linear Mode
