Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The D.A.'s Office
Facebook

Notices

The D.A.'s Office The views expressed in this forum are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of AFF or the Admin of AFF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:14 PM
Jehoram Jehoram is offline
Senor Gunsmoke


 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 859
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Will anyone address the point in the original thread instead of resortng to emotionalism or reiterating their platform?
You don't like them tearing a page from your playbook?


lol
__________________
I am not who I was.

I will not be what I am.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:28 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Will anyone address the point in the original thread instead of resortng to emotionalism or reiterating their platform?
No.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:31 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple View Post
They dont seem to realize the weak point of their own doctrine. If I were them I would be wondering about the smoking gun of Mark 16:16.

He that believes AND is baptized shall be saved but he that believes not shall be damned.

Their view is "he that is saved shall be baptized".
How is Mark 16:16 weak? He came unto his own (Jews)...... He is telling them that they do not need the sacrificial system any longer. They do not need a priest, a temple, a sacrifice. He is the sacrifice. That is what Mark 16:16 is about.

Believe the Good News. The New Covenant they did not see in the OT was here.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:32 PM
COOPER's Avatar
COOPER COOPER is offline
Hello AFF!


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amarillo, Tx.
Posts: 3,611
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
what a sad, sad thread.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:37 PM
Michael The Disciple's Avatar
Michael The Disciple Michael The Disciple is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 14,649
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
How is Mark 16:16 weak? He came unto his own (Jews)...... He is telling them that they do not need the sacrificial system any longer. They do not need a priest, a temple, a sacrifice. He is the sacrifice. That is what Mark 16:16 is about.

Believe the Good News. The New Covenant they did not see in the OT was here.
Mark 16 is not weak. The believe only side cannot get around it. Acts 2:38 mentions faith, baptism, and Holy Spirit baptism.

They want us to feel confused over Acts 10. When I believed like them I felt confused about Mark 16 AND Acts 2:38 when reading them.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:38 PM
Mrs. LPW's Avatar
Mrs. LPW Mrs. LPW is offline
Live like it.


 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,014
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

No one wants to play Dan

I think we know what we believe, we know what we'll preach and we know you're not changing your mind for anyone.

(we also know this merry-go-round makes us dizzy.
__________________
Mrs. LPW

Psalm 19:14
Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer.
My Countdown Counting down to: Spring...
April Showers Bring May Flowers!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:39 PM
StillStanding's Avatar
StillStanding StillStanding is offline
Beautiful are the feet......


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Will anyone address the point in the original thread instead of resortng to emotionalism or reiterating their platform?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-25-2008, 12:51 PM
JamDat JamDat is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 559
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Some believe we must imitate, emulate, re-enact the death, burial, resurretion of Jesus Christ by obeying the Gospel as stated by Peter in Acts 2:38 to be fully saved and born again.

They also believe that John 3:3 teaches the that being born of the water and spirit ... being born again is fully complete by a properly administered water baptism and speaking in other tongues as evidence of receiving the Holy Ghost.

Water baptism is perceived as being part of a recipe ... part of the BORN AGAIN MIX. Furthermore, water baptism is compared by them to only being buried w/ Christ.

The issue I'd like to address is whether or not this "burial" indeed partially regenerates us ... and is efficacious in quickening us by His Spirit into new birth, albeit partial.

It is my belief that Acts 10 still is the smoking gun ... against 3 step theology. If baptism is a burial of the dead man ... necessary to rid the man of the body of sin and wipe his sin stain ... then how could the Spirit of God quicken unto righteousness and life that which is still dead?

Does the indwelling of the Holy Ghost ["resurrrection"} represent the final piece of the 3 step puzzle that must be re-enacted that raises us into new life? ... does His Spirit do this while not setting us free of the law of sin and death or putting to death the deeds/sins of the body? (Romans 8:13)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Please read
Acts 8: 1-14 for this discussion.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. In Acts 10, we find those in the house of Cornelius showing evidence of being indwelt w/ the Holy Spirit yet had not, as some teach, been buried their body of sin ... or carnal man. Some would even say because they had not been baptized they are not yet declared righteous/justified and/or their slate not wiped clean through a properly administered baptism that would effectuate sin remission.

Furthermore, those w/ this sacramental mindset [a rite that mediates grace] are the first to say that unless one does not have the Spirit of Christ they are not His as it applies to speaking in tongues ... yet we see Cornelius being declared His, prior to water baptism.
(Romans 8:9)

We see the the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus setting him free from the law of sin and of death prior to re-enacting a burial of the body of sin???? (Romans 8:2)

2. Also we see that he is declared righteous before God and he is alive because of Christ's imputed righteousness ... by the Spirit indwelling. ....

Romans 8:10 - If Christ is in you, though the body is dead because of sin, yet the spirit is alive because of righteousness.

3. Finally, if re-enactment theology is God-ordained ... repentance is death, baptism is burial and receiving the baptism of the Holy Spirit is the resurrection ...

Then how can Cornelius through his being filled w/ the Holy Ghost have circumvented this process?
It is the initial indwelling of the Spirit of God that puts to DEATH THE DEEDS OF THE BODY SO THAT WE MAY BE QUICKENED TO LIFE, or Destroys the body of sin (Romans 6:6) ...

Romans 13 .... for if you are living according to the flesh, you must die; but if by the Spirit you are putting to death the deeds of the body, you will live.
These gaping holes in their theology show that one, namely Cornelius and those in his house, can be declared righteous, quickened unto life, put to death the deeds of the body, be declared His, set free from the law of sin and death .... not condemened in Christ Jesus ... PRIOR TO BEING FULLY SAVED ... REGENERATED ...OR COMPLETING THE NEW BIRTH PROCESS.

Cornelius was declared a son of God ... born of God ... prior to baptism. With all the priveleges ... full access to our Father and the inheritance of new life.

Romans 8
14For all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.
15For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons by which we cry out, "Abba! Father!"
16The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God,
17and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with Him so that we may also be glorified with Him.

All this before being BURIED INTO CHRIST and having the blood applied in his life???

Please reconcile Romans 8 and other scripture pointing to being born again/born of God BY HIS SPIRIT before completing the proported Born Again recipe.

----------------------------------
Smoking gun??????????????

Blah to that. What was the end result of Acts 10? Looks like your smoking gun took a "third step".

So Daniel, Peter asked a question. "Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?"

Well can ya?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-25-2008, 01:10 PM
RevDWW's Avatar
RevDWW RevDWW is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 5,529
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Acts 10:33 (KJV) 33 Immediately therefore I sent to thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God.
Maybe you need the rest of the story......

Quote:
Acts 10:45 - 48 (KJV) 45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.
If belief and Holy Ghost baptism were all that is required why would Peter command Old Corn and company to get dunked. It is obvious that in both Acts 2 and 10 the baptism commanded is water baptism, because in 2 it was said that if you repented and were baptized you would receive the Holy Ghost and in 10 they had already been "baptized" in the Spirit and were commanded to be baptized in water. And didn't Corn want to hear the commandments of God that were given to Peter?
[All the above was thought out and typed with little if any emotion]
__________________
Psa 119:165 (KJV) 165 Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them.

"Do not believe everthing you read on the internet" - Abe Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-25-2008, 01:18 PM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Acts 10: The Smoking Gun?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple View Post
Mark 16 is not weak. The believe only side cannot get around it. Acts 2:38 mentions faith, baptism, and Holy Spirit baptism.

They want us to feel confused over Acts 10. When I believed like them I felt confused about Mark 16 AND Acts 2:38 when reading them.
Are you saying that it's confusing to you now or was?

Mark isn't confusing to me in relation to Acts 10 and Acts 2:38 because I understand that Jesus is showing them they do not need someone else to bring a sacrifice to Him for their sins. The Priest does not any longer need to go to the Laver for them. They can now come themselves.

If we are questioning the infilling of His Spirit as opposed to just saying you are saved by baptism, that is not going to wash in light of Acts 18:24-26:

Acts 18:24, "And a certain Jew named Apollos, born at Alexandria, an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures, came to Ephesus. (25) This man was instructed in the way of the Lord; and being fervent in the spirit, he spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord, knowing only the baptism of John. (26)And he began to speak boldly in the synagogue: whom when Aquila and Priscilla had heard, they took him unto them, and expounded unto him the way of God more perfectly."
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smoking in pregnancy is far less damaging... Twisp Fellowship Hall 12 02-14-2008 07:38 PM
Acts 2:38 LordChocolate Fellowship Hall 27 12-30-2007 01:57 PM
Acts 2:38 in first several chapters of Acts mfblume Fellowship Hall 2 09-01-2007 11:25 AM
Smoking Nahum Fellowship Hall 68 03-17-2007 03:06 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by jfrog
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.