End Time Army of Women Preachers Psalms 68:11

[Sister Alvear]

Incredibly, the Jewish religious authorities taught that a man should not salute a woman, not even his own wife, in a public place... In the Talmud, we read the statement of Rabbi Eliezer.. that “It is better that the words of the Law should be burned, than that they should be given to a woman.”.. The same rabbi, writing in the Mishnah, adds the following directive: “If a man gives his daughter a knowledge of the Law, it is as though he taught her lechery.”.. And Rabbi Judah’s famous prayer contained
the following words: “Blessed be You for
not having made me a Gentile, a
woman, or an ignoramus (Tosephta
Berakoth, 7, 18).

[Abiding Now]

I wouldn't get up and walk out if a woman was preaching, but I wouldn't PLAN on being there to hear her.

[Sister Alvear]

“Better theTorah be burned than to be studied by a woman” (P. Sotah, 3:4). The Babylonian version states, “He who teaches his daughter the law teaches her tiflut,” variously translated as frivolity, lasciviousness or sin (B. Sotah, 20a)

[Sister Alvear]

”The Talmud clearly affirms the silence of females: “A woman’s voice is prohibited because it is sexually provocative” (Talmud, Berachot 24a).“Women are sexually seductive, mentally inferior, socially embarrassing, and spiritually separated from the law of Moses; therefore, let them be silent” (summary of Talmudic
sayings).

[Sister Alvear]

The Talmud Called the Voice of a Woman “Shameful.” “It is a shame for a woman to let her voice be heard among men” (Talmud, Tractate Kiddushin).“The voice of a woman is filthy nakedness” (Talmud, Berachot Kiddushin).

[Sister Alvear]

The English translation of the Greek word,..aiskron, as “shameful” or “improper” hardly convey the strength of what the word encompasses. The affirmation in verse 35, is that a woman’s speaking is “lewd, vile, filthy, indecent, foul, dirty and morally degraded.” (SOUNDS LIKE BRANHAM DOCTRINE TO ME)

[Sister Alvear]

Originally Posted by Abiding Now

I wouldn't get up and walk out if a woman was preaching, but I wouldn't PLAN on being there to hear her.

Well, my friend...I am glad thousands of little Brazilians listened to me as I taught about Jesus under trees, in open yards, in the marlet places, on street corners and wherever...and today many of those same men that once sat in pagan darkness pastor large churches...they don't seem to mind that I told them about the Savior and He saved them...

Blessings to you...at least you said you would not walk out...maybe I will catch you by surprize sometime....lol....

Don't fear I promise not to kick my leg or beat on the pulpit...ha....I usually just sit on the altar bench and tell about Brazil...

[Sister Alvear]

Instead, those basing their view of women on the oral law did. Paul never required women to be silent and never called female speaking “lewd and filthy.” The Talmud was guilty of advocating both. This is further confirmed in verse 36 when Paul exclaims..“What! Did the Word of God originate with you?”..The..“What!”..indicates that Paul is not in harmony with what was stated by others from the Talmud in vv.34-35...Thayer’s Lexicon notes that the..“What”..is a disjunctive conjunction..“before a sentence contrary to the one just preceding, to indicate that if one be denied or refuted the other must stand.”

[Sister Alvear]

Paul is making a quotation from the letter addressed to him by the Corinthians whenever he alludes to their knowledge, or when any statement stands in marked contrast either with the immediate context or with Paul’s known views.”..Paul contrasts his commands which promote edification by the varied contributions of all with the restrictive prohibitions upon women demanded by the anti-gospel Talmud. Paul saw the voices of the sisters as a vital part of the building up of the body of Messiah. The Talmud, on the other hand, viewed female voices as “shameful” and as “filthy nakedness.”

[Sister Alvear]

We know the Corinthian Christians had written Paul a letter (7:1) and that in that letter a number of issues were raised that Paul needed to address .In Paul’s letter, as he addressed a question or issue that had been raised by the Corinthians in their letter to him, sometimes he simply referred to the subject in question, and then responded to it, as in the following examples:1:11 – “For it was declared to me about you, my brethren, by the ones of Chloe, that there are strifes among you ...”7:1 – Paul says, “now concerning the things about which you wrote . . .”7:25 – “now concerning virgins . . .”8:1

“now concerning things sacrificed to idols . . .”9:1 – he asks questions to bring up the next subject, “Am I not free?” “Am I not an apostle?,” etc. He is obviously referring to their questions regarding his being called an apostle.12:1 – “now concerning spiritual gifts . . .”Other times Paul repeated the Corinthian’s erroneous statements and then proceeded to correct, or bring balance to, their thinking. 6:12 – Paul seems to be quoting them:..“All things are lawful for me,”..then he counters with..“but all things are not profitable.”..