I Have AIDS - Page 18

J-Roc · #**171** 03-13-2007, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

The bolded portion of your post reveals the incredibly warped view that keeps me from taking you seriously on this subject.

Well I guess that makes you shallow-minded.

Coonskinner · #**172** 03-13-2007, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Annie

I know you quoted his post, but some 'key' words caught my attention, as I had used them last night when posting on this thread...

I was going to try to clear up any problem, if you were addressing me. *smile* I want no enemies on here...

Sister,

I don't recall anything you wrote last night.

I felt that the intent of your post was just simply compassion--and that is honorable, even when it might be a trifle naive.

The post I quoted was from an individual who likes to critique the Church and the ministry, and considers himself imminently qualified.

That was what I objected to.

Coonskinner · #**173** 03-13-2007, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J-Roc

Well I guess that makes you shallow-minded.

Coming from you, Brother, I will take that as a compliment.

J-Roc · #**174** 03-13-2007, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

No.

The dude that said gays couldn't even get in the doors of our churches.

I quoted his post in my reply.

You missed the point...the implication was that society already shuns them so the church must be a city of refuge for this group...and if they cant make into church where else can they turn...it's called a hypothetical.

SDG · #**175** 03-13-2007, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

Sister,

I don't recall anything you wrote last night.

I felt that the intent of your post was just simply compassion--and that is honorable, even when it might be a trifle naive.

The post I quoted was from an individual who likes to critique the Church and the ministry, and considers himself imminently qualified.

That was what I objected to.

MC CS ... Where does one get imminently qualified to critique the Church and ministry .... apparently this must a secret lodge requiring your endorsement?

Admin · #**176** 03-13-2007, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J-Roc

Well I guess that makes you shallow-minded.

Please remember we need to stick to the issue, not the individual.

Coonskinner · #**177** 03-13-2007, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Admin

Please remember we need to stick to the issue, not the individual.

Please let the record show that I did not report nor complain about the post, nor was I bothered by it.

I am not questioning the action of admin, just wanting to clarify that it did not disturb me in the least, and that anything admin did, they did as a matter of principle and not at my request.

Nahum · #**178** 03-13-2007, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

Please let the record show that I did not report nor complain about the post, nor was I bothered by it.

I am not questioning the action of admin, just wanting to clarify that it did not disturb me in the least, and that anything admin did, they did as a matter of principle and not at my request.

Tattletale

lol

J-Roc · #**179** 03-13-2007, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

Please let the record show that I did not report nor complain about the post, nor was I bothered by it.

I am not questioning the action of admin, just wanting to clarify that it did not disturb me in the least, and that anything admin did, they did as a matter of principle and not at my request.

You're a good sport!

SDG · #**180** 03-13-2007, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coonskinner

Please let the record show that I did not report nor complain about the post, nor was I bothered by it.

I am not questioning the action of admin, just wanting to clarify that it did not disturb me in the least, and that anything admin did, they did as a matter of principle and not at my request.

Truly you are the bigger MAN