Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 08-05-2007, 07:20 AM
Rhoni Rhoni is offline
delete account


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,086
Interesting indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 08-05-2007, 02:51 PM
philjones
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh View Post
On a side note...I have a very high class evangelist coming to preach for me in September. I've been preaching out as much as possible this summer so I can afford his extravagant demands.

Now that I've seen him on this thread I'm getting pretty worried. By the time he gets here he might actually expect to be paid something.
OP is in trouble now!
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 08-05-2007, 07:12 PM
Truly Blessed Truly Blessed is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother Strange View Post
I'd be more interested in Kenneth Haney's salary and annual love offerings. Does anyone know? I'd bet it would be much easier to find out about Billy Graham's than it would Kenneth Haney's. Whadayathink?

Wonder what you would get if you were to just walk up to him and ask him this question?

Think you would get a long blank stare?
This is an issue I have a problem with in regards to UPCI and their policy on headquarters personnel receiving offerings. It's my understanding that they get an executive salary, but also get to keep whatever offerings they receive when preaching out.

It was always my position that any honorariums received for representing UPCI should go into the department they represent, not to the individual. Has this policy changed in recent years?

In the ACOP all honorariums received by our GS go into the General Account. The same is true with other departments.
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 08-05-2007, 09:31 PM
Fonix
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
I know they use to make the UPCI missionaries pay 15% to HQ when they receieve offerings and PIM's while deputizing. It may be 18% now. I think that is very wrong. Missionaries need there money more than HQ unless Im highly mistaken.
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 08-05-2007, 11:51 PM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fonix View Post
I know they use to make the UPCI missionaries pay 15% to HQ when they receieve offerings and PIM's while deputizing. It may be 18% now. I think that is very wrong. Missionaries need there money more than HQ unless Im highly mistaken.
There are legitimate overhead expenses involved in running the Foreign Missions division of the UPCI. I woudl imagine that is why they take a cut of the offerings and PIM's.

I seriously doubt they are just doing it to keep money from missionaries!!
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 08-05-2007, 11:59 PM
rrford's Avatar
rrford rrford is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1 View Post
There are legitimate overhead expenses involved in running the Foreign Missions division of the UPCI. I woudl imagine that is why they take a cut of the offerings and PIM's.

I seriously doubt they are just doing it to keep money from missionaries!!
A percentage of the offerings a FM receives in a District is returned to the District as a booking fee. This allows the District FM department to operate as it is, for the most part, its only income. This money is used to pay the expenses of scheduling missionaries that are on deputation and other related expenses.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 08-06-2007, 06:08 AM
Fonix
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrford View Post
A percentage of the offerings a FM receives in a District is returned to the District as a booking fee. This allows the District FM department to operate as it is, for the most part, its only income. This money is used to pay the expenses of scheduling missionaries that are on deputation and other related expenses.

I realize there is a reason and it is for overhead expenses but wouldnt it be better to be able to take it from some other place than actually from the missionaries? To me that is a large percentage. Maybe Im wrong and just dont understand how much $ it takes. Im never above saying Im the wrong one.
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 08-06-2007, 07:08 AM
Brother Strange
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truly Blessed View Post
This is an issue I have a problem with in regards to UPCI and their policy on headquarters personnel receiving offerings. It's my understanding that they get an executive salary, but also get to keep whatever offerings they receive when preaching out.

It was always my position that any honorariums received for representing UPCI should go into the department they represent, not to the individual. Has this policy changed in recent years?

In the ACOP all honorariums received by our GS go into the General Account. The same is true with other departments.
I'm not sure. I doubt it though. Old habits are hard to break sometimes.

At one new church building dedication several years ago, the then GS received a $10,000.00 "love offering" for the one night service. I have to admit he did preach a good message though. I still have the tape.

So, I did a little arithmetic. If I could preach at least one church dedication per week, at the rate of 10k per dedication, in one year. That would be 520K per year. Man! What a racket. That would be better than Loan Sharking and less dangerous too.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 08-06-2007, 08:43 AM
Esther's Avatar
Esther Esther is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrford View Post
A percentage of the offerings a FM receives in a District is returned to the District as a booking fee. This allows the District FM department to operate as it is, for the most part, its only income. This money is used to pay the expenses of scheduling missionaries that are on deputation and other related expenses.
Wonder what that would be other than perhaps long distance fees???
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 08-06-2007, 08:45 AM
CC1's Avatar
CC1 CC1 is offline
Administrator


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fonix View Post
I realize there is a reason and it is for overhead expenses but wouldnt it be better to be able to take it from some other place than actually from the missionaries? To me that is a large percentage. Maybe Im wrong and just dont understand how much $ it takes. Im never above saying Im the wrong one.
Where exactly would you take it from then? Last time I checked the UPCI does not have the authority to tax people or make them give offerings.

A primary mechanism by which missionaries raise money for their effort which includes the support of the foreign missions department at HQ is them traveling around raising support through one time offerings and PIM's.

You are trying to artificially seperate the missionary from the foregin missions department.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
20 Don’ts For Young Preachers rrford Deep Waters 37 11-26-2008 03:37 PM
Medison Celebrity, $150 of Linux laptop for the people Ronzo Tech Talk: with Bit & Byte 6 08-03-2007 01:23 PM
Women Preachers DEAK Fellowship Hall 69 07-17-2007 03:15 PM
Any UPC Preachers Here? Elihu Fellowship Hall 38 06-16-2007 06:54 PM
20 Don'ts for Old Preachers Nahum Deep Waters 12 02-18-2007 07:42 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.