Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Pitta
If we are going to refer to a specific manuscript, we should refer to it by name. That way, everyone knows which specific manuscript is being discussed.
|
Reasonable point. That may be a reference to:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Avery
The arguments for Mark being written in Latin (or a Graeco-Latin dialect or in two editions) are quite strong, and have been advanced by a wide variety of scholars. They simply have been bypassed because the hortian Critical Text theories that are popular today focus almost exclusively on a couple of Greek manuscripts. One of which is in "phenomenally good condition" and which the evidences shows was written in the 1800s and then coloured artificially to give it an appearance of age.
|
Where I was being a smidgen cutesy.
That would be a reference to
Codex Sinaiticus. I'll start a thread on the topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias
Mr Avery, your posts here are appreciated. You have definitely put in quite a bit of work in researching the subject.
|
Thanks, Esaias, appreciated. I simply try to understand the topics, with common sense being the basic tool, sometimes combined with careful research and checking.
Steven Avery
Dutchess County, NY
Linear Mode
