Is this becoming an EX-Pentecostal site?

[CC1]

I think Brother Eastman Kodak is looking the lib way since he never did address my point on another thread that there is as much distinction between men's and women's pants today as there was between men's and women's robes in the bible days.

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

PP is off licking his wounds.

shucks!

[SDG]

Originally Posted by CC1

I think Brother Eastman Kodak is looking the lib way since he never did address my point on another thread that there is as much distinction between men's and women's pants today as there was between men's and women's robes in the bible days.

He's more lib than you think ....

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by CC1

I think Brother Eastman Kodak is looking the lib way since he never did address my point on another thread that there is as much distinction between men's and women's pants today as there was between men's and women's robes in the bible days.

I haven't gotten there yet. Everytime I get to one of these threads, it takes me forever to catch up on the subject. Don't worry, I'll get there, and once I do, you'll see that I'm right as usual. LOL!

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

Has anyone,(up to this point in the discussion) said you didn't love your heritage? I didn't read that Dan.

I think Daniel struggles with the issue of heritage. It is the biggest hole in his armor. On one hand he is proud of what his family has accomplished in the past. On the other hand he rails against those who hold to the same ideals he once held.

It's a weird sort of self-loathing I suppose.

Notice how defensive he was even when no one mentioned his name?
I think Epley hit a little too close to home.

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

He's more lib than you think ....

Like I said Danny, I'll get you converted yet!

[Digging4Truth]

As we near page 18 of this thread...

Epley has made it clear that he is speaking of the actual Acts 2:38 salvational doctrine and not standards etc.

So... with that in mind...

Who has been talking against that?

[BrotherEastman]

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster

I think Daniel struggles with the issue of heritage. It is the biggest hole in his armor. On one hand he is proud of what his family has accomplished in the past. On the other hand he rails against those who hold to the same ideals he once held.

It's a weird sort of self-loathing I suppose.

Notice how defensive he was even when no one mentioned his name?
I think Epley hit a little too close to home.

Yeah, I've noticed that about Danny as well PP.

[Nahum]

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

PP is off licking his wounds.

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

shucks!

Yeah, it really bothers me when people whose opinions mean nothing to me insult me. I don't fit in dan's little box and that really torques him.

[rgcraig]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

As we near page 18 of this thread...

Epley has made it clear that he is speaking of the actual Acts 2:38 salvational doctrine and not standards etc.

So... with that in mind...

Who has been talking against that?

No one, but those lines get blurred when the rubber hits the road with many of these.