Debunking a 9-11 myth

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by shazeep

i may have named the wrong part; it's been a few years since i saw the cruise missile comparo.

Either way, its the perfect size. BTW a cruise missile uses a turobo fan and is rather small. So there is no way that came from a cruise missile

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by shazeep

the lack of multiple stories of debris, and the amount of airborne debris has swayed me to the "power weapon" idea--plus i saw a video by the power weapon lady where an I beam ejected from the building whole and then just... dissolved, in the air. So at a guess it seems that a controlled demo was used to cover a power weapon test. As to the molten river, there were plenty of witnesses, and none of these theories are mine, as you know.

There was a huge, high pile of Debris

Dont forget the buildings pancaked beginning at the site of impact. An explosive would not have created a river of molten metal. A Power weapon would have exploded. There is no explosion and the pancaking blows your theory

[Esaias]

The explosives, combined with thermite/thermate, destroyed the supports, allowing the free fall. More importantly, the buildings were "dustified" as they collapsed, something that has not been explained.

Whatever happened, it wasn't the result of a jumbo jet crashing into the upper stories. Thankfully, the hijackers' passports were made of asbestos and survived to be found on the ground immediately afterwords.

[shazeep]

ya, the link below returns for "Judy Wood" and "dustified."

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Either way, its the perfect size. BTW a cruise missile uses a turobo fan and is rather small. So there is no way that came from a cruise missile

i haven't had time to seek the video showing that, but it's out there. "Cruise missile" might not be correct.

[shazeep]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

There was a huge, high pile of Debris

Dont forget the buildings pancaked beginning at the site of impact. An explosive would not have created a river of molten metal. A Power weapon would have exploded. There is no explosion and the pancaking blows your theory

well again, it isn't mine, but i recall the picture of the site afterward showed a virtually ground-level mess, with one corner rising to like 3 stories? Thermite made the river, i guess. And the power weapon did not seem to explode, so much as dissolve, like a disintegrator. The power weapon lady has it in her videos, and it is on youtube--the second one in this return shows some evidence, but not the i beam i saw eject and then vaporize.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...m%20dissolving

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Esaias

The explosives, combined with thermite/thermate, destroyed the supports, allowing the free fall. More importantly, the buildings were "dustified" as they collapsed, something that has not been explained.

Whatever happened, it wasn't the result of a jumbo jet crashing into the upper stories. Thankfully, the hijackers' passports were made of asbestos and survived to be found on the ground immediately afterwords.

Each level pancaking blew out debris

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by shazeep

well again, it isn't mine, but i recall the picture of the site afterward showed a virtually ground-level mess, with one corner rising to like 3 stories? Thermite made the river, i guess. And the power weapon did not seem to explode, so much as dissolve, like a disintegrator. The power weapon lady has it in her videos, and it is on youtube--the second one in this return shows some evidence, but not the i beam i saw eject and then vaporize.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...m%20dissolving

What river?

BTW do you really believe that when a building as high as WTC collapses, it has to pile up in a nice neat stack?

Disintegrater ray gun? You're kidding right?

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by shazeep

well again, it isn't mine, but i recall the picture of the site afterward showed a virtually ground-level mess, with one corner rising to like 3 stories? Thermite made the river, i guess. And the power weapon did not seem to explode, so much as dissolve, like a disintegrator. The power weapon lady has it in her videos, and it is on youtube--the second one in this return shows some evidence, but not the i beam i saw eject and then vaporize.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...m%20dissolving

LOL..I watched the video..Some guy takes stock video where dust is flying up and then zooms in as the dust rises up over a beam and claims it was disintegrated. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by shazeep

i suggest that you have condemned one of your children for a sin that they committed without direct proof, as you did not need it; and neither do we, in civil trials. Was OJ guilty? Criminally, no; civilly, yes. Which is truth?

I condemned of my children for sin but had no proof? Are you kidding me?
Is that what you do with your children? Accuse them and punish them without PROOF? That is madness. Sorry, but you need proof. Repeat after me, conspiracy THEORY. Not conspiracy FACT. Big difference. You want to live in a world were people are guilty until proven innocent then good luck that. But I will stay with innocent until proven guilty. Shazzep, you are a Troll, who just wants to jerk people up, and get a laugh. May I suggest you find some other hobby. Why don't you go back to pulling wings off of flies?

[shazeep]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

What river?

BTW do you really believe that when a building as high as WTC collapses, it has to pile up in a nice neat stack?

Disintegrater ray gun? You're kidding right?

well, the 2nd video is not showing the I beam that ejected from up high and hung/fell beside the body of the building before just...disappearing; but a less dramatic shot can be seen in the vertical leftover there that basically does the same thing, just dustifies as it is falling. Certainly there is a lot of dust in a demo, but you can even watch demos and compare. I'll eventually run across the I beam one and post it.