The Results Of My Poll Are Shocking

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by TGBTG

All that explanation does not change the fact only the Father knows the time. Now if Jesus is fully God and He knows the time like oneness and trinies would have us believe, then it sure seems like MTD was right in asserting that Jesus in fact is the everlasting Father.

BTW Oneness and trinitarians don't say Jesus (the Son) knows the time. Where do you get that from?

The point was Jesus does NOT know the time because He is limited to His human mind

[Michael The Disciple]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

It wasn't meant to change the fact that only the Father knows the time...BTW you are a fast reader, you finished all three of those in no time.

If the Son is the Father how can the Son not know the time but the Father does?

Yeshua is not ONLY the Everlasting Father. As such he is YHWH the God of Abraham, Issac, and Jacob. He ALSO is in another mode of being and that simultaneously the begotten son.

A simple way to put it might be something like God is living two lives at once. As the man Christ Jesus he is still subject to the Fathers will. As the Father (YHWH) he calls the shots.

[A.W. Bowman]

Originally Posted by seekerman

What's a "Rebbe"?

A Rebbe has two generally accepted meanings. The first, which does not apply to me, is a term of endearment for a Yeshiva (formal Jewish theological university) ordained Rabbi. The second meaning can be applied to a Bible teacher or scholar who may not have a traditional Jewish (Yeshiva) ordination.

I hesitated in adding that term to my profile because it was only two years ago that after 35 some years of study and teaching, I took upon myself, without the consent of any other living person or organization, the title of 'Serious Student of the Word'.

Or, I like this new tag better.

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

My impression is of staggering stupidity...

How many ways have you been confronted with the fact that your view of "Oneness" is neither embraced by Oneness scholars nor by many within the movement.

You just ignore this fact over and over and over...

All the time proclaiming that if the rank and file don't agree with your statements they are not Oneness.

What a joke.

It sounds like Michael was taught by those who were hardcore Modalists, not necessarily "Oneness". There is a difference.